>>64099417
To turn that around the only way you could think this is if you believe Ukraine itself immune to attrition. That it has no looming, however far away, failure point.
The calculus for this conflict since Putin doubled down (I really just mean here when he decided to keep going after the SMO had obviously failed) and since Russia proved it can slowly grind forward has been:
Will the Ukrainian war footing outlast the Russian war footing or vice versa. Think Germany throwing in the towel in 1918.
Right now I personally believe the Russian war footing is showing novel cracks (and Putin is disingenuously buying time) but please understand the win condition for Russia is not spending 15 years getting to the Dnieper. Strategically why the west dumps money/material into Ukraine is because it allays threats to their war footing on economic grounds, it narrows Ukraine's issue to one of manpower. Therefore Ukraine's fortified cities and defense in depth are its posture for this reason, they're manpower multipliers.
On the other hand /k/'s seen enough kill vids to know Russia is just absorbing manpower loses with little regard, and the primary threat to Russia is an economic inability to maintain their war footing. The subsidization of Ukraine, the defensive posture of Ukraine, and the sanction of Russia have a synergistic effect aimed at buttressing Ukraine's war footing and knee-capping Russia's.