>>64123068 (OP)
I'm guessing you live in California.
No, nobody would be mad. These are your guns that you want to buy for reasons specific to your situation. They aren't bad choices if it is a restricted state.
>Beretta 686
It isn't a practical home defense shotgun, but that isn't what you are buying it for. You specifically want to shoot sporting clays. It isn't cheap, but no worthwhile OU is cheap. The 686 is the recommended starting shotgun for anyone who wants to take that sport seriously. It is a fine choice, and I recommend it wholeheartedly.
>Mini-14
An ok choice. It is more expensive and less capable than an AR, but not having to dance around legal complications is a big help. Be sure to buy a new one, because they were redesigned and heavily improved around 2008, with older models suffering horrible accuracy problems. The new models do need an upgraded rear sight (Tech Sights) because the factory one is absolutely worthless.
Rocking the magazines in/out is tricky but easy enough with practice. The factory 5s and 10s are hard to grasp so see if you can get some blocked 10/20s or at least John Masen mags which have longer bodies.
Also consider moving up to an M14 clone. They are considerably heavier and more expensive, but if you are being limited to 10 rounds there is logic to them being 308 rather than 5.56mm. When I lived in California once I made that switch I never went back, but it is a side grade since you are trading away a lighter/smaller gun with cheaper ammunition.
>Springfield 1911
I think they are ok. 1911s in general are great. They aren't the most modern, but they are popular for a reason. I recommend trying a variety of available pistols before committing to one because personal preference is a huge factor, but a 1911 should absolutely be on your try list.
>>64123143
They can do ~1-2 with the right ammo and an optic nowadays. Old models you'd be lucky to get under 5 without at least an accustrut.
>>64123500
Not ban state compliant though.