>>64124292
>you have to relinquish your territories
No you don't. That has never been a rule and people who keep citing it don't actually read. There is no rule blocking people with territorial disputes from joining NATO. It's just that a lot of states would veto it because they don't want potential shit, but there is no actual rule.
>>64124294
Because Trump is retarded and thinks Putin is reason and his friend and it's likely Putin has dirt on Trump going back to the 90's.
>>64124297
Won't happen but what he should do.
>>64124304
Not true at all. Go and cite me the part of the treaty that states that, I'll wait. The treaty doesn't even explain what happens if, lets say, China attacks Hawaii.