← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 64124419

40 posts 24 images /k/
Anonymous No.64124419 >>64124424 >>64124520 >>64124561 >>64124570 >>64126057
I like the J-10. It takes what's good from the F-16, Lavi and Eurocanards without the downsides.
Anonymous No.64124424 >>64124548
>>64124419 (OP)
>F-16, Lavi
You mean J-9II, the basic aerodynamic of the J-10 was defined during the cancelled J-9.
Anonymous No.64124429
Well it's a newer design. It would be weird if it didn't improve.
Anonymous No.64124490 >>64127188 >>64127190
The modern F-16 is an avionics and weapons package in a reliable airframe, we dont know squat about the avoinics, weapons, or reliability of this plane yet because of the same issue plenty of potentially decent euro designs have, they simply dont get used by countries that wage war frequently.
Anonymous No.64124520 >>64124548 >>64127501
>>64124419 (OP)
The F2 did it all better 5 years before the chinese
Anonymous No.64124548 >>64124642 >>64124653 >>64125946
>>64124424
NTA but it looks like a Lavi to me
>>64124520
F-2 is a rebranded F-16
Anonymous No.64124561 >>64125983 >>64126034
>>64124419 (OP)
and you know this how, china said so?

thread dismissed.
Anonymous No.64124570 >>64124572
>>64124419 (OP)
What "downsides" does the Eurofighter have that this doesn't?
Anonymous No.64124572 >>64124628 >>64124743
>>64124570
It's german/british
Anonymous No.64124628
>>64124572
that's an upside, those people are better than the chinese in every single respect except maybe at inhuman and buglike behaviour, a fact demonstrated recently by a chink captain of a massive, modern guided missile destroyer attempting to retardedly ram a much more nimble ship, failing, hitting and seriously damaging another chink ship who's captain was also clearly not paying any attention, and then instead of rendering aid to the potentially sinking ally, CONTINUING TO CHASE THE FLIP COASTGUARD CUTTER AND ATTEMPTING AND FAILING ANOTHER RAM.
all other factors like chinese technological inferiority are insignificant compared to the IQ and cultural/behavioural incentive difference between the chinese and the americans.

that single event there, is so fucking hilariously awful and retarded that if a serious power like the US did it (in the same fashion, not just any collision) they would be reminded of it for the next 100 years and would at all costs try to avoid it happening ever again, chinks never learn these kinds of lessons because they bury the event, put their thumbs in their ears and scream LALALALALA IT DIDN'T HAPPEN BUT IF IT DID IT'S ACTUALLY NORMAL AND EVERYONE DOES IT LALALALA.
Anonymous No.64124642
>>64124548
>NTA but it looks like a Lavi to me
Because the Lavi had obvious soviet influence like the MiG-21 and MiG-23, Chengdu and Shenyang had a lot of soviet influence too for obvious reasons.
The airbrakes are the most obvious example, IAI didn't copy the F-16 pattern but the Soviet pattern.
Anonymous No.64124653 >>64126675
>>64124548
F2 is a better F-16 with 50% more combat radius, 3 extra hardpoints and an AESA radar back in 1999.
Anonymous No.64124743
>>64124572
this is Chinese
Anonymous No.64125896 >>64125910 >>64125983 >>64127501
The JSDF F-2 is way better than chinesium junk like the j-10.
Anonymous No.64125910 >>64125913 >>64125946
>>64125896
It's a F-16 there's nothing special about it
Anonymous No.64125913 >>64125919
>>64125910
it's Japanese
Anonymous No.64125919 >>64125946
>>64125913
Which means it's made of folded paper
Anonymous No.64125940
Anonymous No.64125946
>>64124548
>>64125910
>>64125919
Anonymous No.64125983 >>64126018 >>64126049 >>64129198
>>64124561
You’re a huge faggot and you need to stfu

>>64125896
F2 is a piece of shit by today’s standards. And don’t get me started with their vertical stabs sheering off, you fucking retarded weeb.
Anonymous No.64126018
>>64125983
dont burst a blood vessel there chang
Anonymous No.64126034
>>64124561
Yeah I'm sure the world's 2nd largest economy couldn't slap together a 4th gen
Anonymous No.64126049
>>64125983
Paki shitskin hands wrote this
Anonymous No.64126057
>>64124419 (OP)
The eurofighter would obliterate it
Anonymous No.64126132 >>64127501
Anonymous No.64126675 >>64126703 >>64126706
>>64124653
More weight with same power and less canopy visibility.
Anonymous No.64126703
>>64126675
Dogfighting died 40 years ago
Anonymous No.64126706 >>64127258
>>64126675
The same applies to the F-35A/C
Anonymous No.64126719 >>64127501
Anonymous No.64127188
>>64124490
It clapped some rafales so I guess it's pretty good.
Anonymous No.64127190
>>64124490
>we dont know squat about the avoinics, weapons, or reliability of this plane yet
This.
Anonymous No.64127258 >>64127288
>>64126706
It's engine is more powerful and has a see-through helmet
Anonymous No.64127288
>>64127258
>It's engine is more powerful
and the plane is way heavier, the TWR is worse than the F-16
Anonymous No.64127501 >>64127839
>>64126132
>>64126719
>>64125896
>>64124520
I HATE the f2 because the FSX was going to be the trve viper zero then america decided to lobotomize japan and steal its composite and avionics technology all the while forcing japan to fellate general dynamics. Tragic. The fsx was going to be beautiful. Better than any eurotrash or rafail.
Anonymous No.64127839 >>64127854
>>64127501
That's a rafale
Anonymous No.64127854 >>64127983
>>64127839
Nta but rafales got a single rudder iirc
Anonymous No.64127983
>>64127854
That's a rafale with two rudders
Anonymous No.64128787
Anonymous No.64128872
Anonymous No.64129198
>>64125983
IMPLESSIVE CHING CHONG BING BONG