>>64131106 (OP)
China wins because unlike Russia, they can actually produce them. Prepare to see them in the hundreds or if they are legit the successor of the Type 96 then prepare to see thousand+
>>64131222 >The L1 didn't see combat pre Ukraine >The L2 didn't see combat pre Syria >The Leclerc didn't see a high intensity battlefield, just minor COIN in Yemen >Japanese, Italian, South Korean tanks: no combat in a foreseeable future
>>64131250 >china's new tank or russia's armata >gives a response why china win >OMG here is Russia's tank casualty!
??? Are people here becoming this desperate?
>>64131183
Probably another chinkposter which is much milder, since the chinkspammer always shit on western hardware at the same time, often right at the opening post with a snide remark, with something like "why is US so good" with a chinkshit pic doing implessive maneuvering.
>>64131284
Yea gotta wait for the parade to see who gets what.
The police is already arresting certain spotters in the area for unauthorized disclosure.
>>64131106 (OP)
The Chinese turret seems to have actual fucking armor unlike the paper T-14 turret. Don't know about Chinese APS but we can be reasonably sure that Russian APS doesn't work. Distributed optics is good and something the Armata doesn't have as far as I'm aware. Possibly a better RWS on the ZTZ-201 but IDK
Overall it looks like and is functionally more similar US/European next generation tank prototypes and concepts than Slavshit. I'm expecting that their ZTZ-99 replacement will be similar to this but bigger
>>64131106 (OP) >Which one did the next gen tank stuff better?
Poland
Equally vaporware, too. Only better! >>64131476 >>64131480 >>64131482 >>64131485
why does chinesium chicom shit always look like a plastic toy?
this goes for everything from their rifles to their cars, plastic toy shit that hyper-focuses on kitschy looks and ignores everything that matters
>>64131518
From the three hypersonics wouldn't the YJ-17 HGV be the least powerful since it's so flat? It means that it won't have enough space for a big warhead. Both the YJ-19 and YJ-20 seem to be much better antiship missiles.
>>64131106 (OP)
China for the simple reason that it is reasonable to believe that China can actually get their next-gen tank out of the prototype stage and into mass production.
>>64131594
Still, its shape means that it won't be able to carry as big warhead as the HACM and MARV. For antiship role the warhead size is key, that's why you should laugh at anyone who claims that the SM-6 is also antiship hypersonic missile with its 64kg warhead...
>>64131645
Clearly the sm6 is living rent free in your head since you brought it up completely unprompted in your own shill thread
Hell, even the LRASM lmao >>64131536
>>64131634
Yeah, I guess kinetic energy is the main killing device here. On the other hand, it being a glider can still potentially have the same 120kg warhead as a YJ-83, since saves the fuel space.
A 120kg semi armor piercing EFP warhead can be quite compact.
>>64131654 >US "hypersonic" missile is an antiair missile with tiny warhead repurposed for "antiship" and ground attack role >US main anti-ship missile is still a subsonic harpoon but in a body kit >Chinese hypersonics: Scramjet HCM, HGV and MARV for both anti-ship and land attack role
Impressive
>>64131897
Did you ever have dreams of greatness and success before you got lumped with having to parrot the vernacular of a Mongolian Nickelodeon fansite for a living?
>>64131516 >why does chinesium chicom shit always look like a plastic toy?
Bodykit looks implessive, and looking implessive is 90% of the aim for a face culture terrified of the thought of ever receiving a setback.