← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 64131106

79 posts 48 images /k/
Anonymous No.64131106 >>64131117 >>64131232 >>64131359 >>64131457 >>64131505 >>64131516 >>64131618 >>64131626 >>64131816
ZTZ-201 vs Armata
Which one did the next gen tank stuff better?
Anonymous No.64131110 >>64131113
Both tanks are unmanned turret Tanks that are highly automatized and rely on APS and sensor fusion.
Anonymous No.64131113 >>64131116 >>64131204 >>64131284 >>64131820
>>64131110
ZTZ-201 also appears to offer 360 vision via AR glasses for the crew.
Anonymous No.64131116 >>64131120
>>64131113
The ZTZ-201 is a smaller and lighter tank, which uses a Diesel hybrid electric drive.
Anonymous No.64131117
>>64131106 (OP)
This has got to be a shill thread, right? Besides the weird ass comparison, the zigger armata doesn't even exist.
Anonymous No.64131119 >>64131126
One is vaporware born from extrapolating the oil price, the other will be a normal tank in service.
Discussing it is a waste of time.
Anonymous No.64131120
>>64131116
Common chassis with the new IFV
Anonymous No.64131126 >>64131143
>>64131119
>in service
>implying chinese tanks will ever be used even against militias
chinks are too scared for that
Anonymous No.64131143 >>64131222
>>64131126
>irrelevant point
Anonymous No.64131183 >>64131297
Oh goodie, an implessive 50 cent per hour thread.
Anonymous No.64131204 >>64131820
>>64131113
Now that's cool.
Anonymous No.64131222 >>64131246
>>64131143
it's not irrelevant, because they're both tanks that exist only for publicity stunts, as opposed to western tanks that actually see combat
Anonymous No.64131232 >>64131250
>>64131106 (OP)
China wins because unlike Russia, they can actually produce them. Prepare to see them in the hundreds or if they are legit the successor of the Type 96 then prepare to see thousand+
Anonymous No.64131246
>>64131222
>The L1 didn't see combat pre Ukraine
>The L2 didn't see combat pre Syria
>The Leclerc didn't see a high intensity battlefield, just minor COIN in Yemen
>Japanese, Italian, South Korean tanks: no combat in a foreseeable future
Anonymous No.64131250 >>64131258 >>64131263
>>64131232
>hundreds
implessive
Anonymous No.64131258 >>64131272
>>64131250
I dont even know what you are trying to say
Anonymous No.64131263 >>64131272
>>64131250
>china's new tank or russia's armata
>gives a response why china win
>OMG here is Russia's tank casualty!
??? Are people here becoming this desperate?
Anonymous No.64131272 >>64131279
>>64131258
>>64131263
>confused ESL noises
Anonymous No.64131279 >>64131324
>>64131272
but enough about yourself
Anonymous No.64131284 >>64131316
>>64131113
they dont have AR glasses on this one. Maybe they didnt put it on or only selected units
Anonymous No.64131297 >>64131505
>>64131183
Probably another chinkposter which is much milder, since the chinkspammer always shit on western hardware at the same time, often right at the opening post with a snide remark, with something like "why is US so good" with a chinkshit pic doing implessive maneuvering.
Anonymous No.64131316
>>64131284
Yea gotta wait for the parade to see who gets what.
The police is already arresting certain spotters in the area for unauthorized disclosure.
Anonymous No.64131324
>>64131279
post hands gun and outlet
Anonymous No.64131359 >>64131364
>>64131106 (OP)
Well, the chink one is relatively likely to not be vapourware, and far more likely to not break down on parade.
Anonymous No.64131364
>>64131359
>vapourware
esl detected
Anonymous No.64131401
You guys have to calm down. The chinkspammer might have been a faggot, but this is just a tank. Goddamn Indonesia, Israel, and Turkey make tanks.
Anonymous No.64131457 >>64131477 >>64131499
>>64131106 (OP)
The Chinese turret seems to have actual fucking armor unlike the paper T-14 turret. Don't know about Chinese APS but we can be reasonably sure that Russian APS doesn't work. Distributed optics is good and something the Armata doesn't have as far as I'm aware. Possibly a better RWS on the ZTZ-201 but IDK
Overall it looks like and is functionally more similar US/European next generation tank prototypes and concepts than Slavshit. I'm expecting that their ZTZ-99 replacement will be similar to this but bigger
Anonymous No.64131476 >>64131516 >>64131649
The new tanks with the AR goggles
Anonymous No.64131477
>>64131457
My guy you people need to get over your illogical hate boner for muh Russia
we have video of Russian APS intercepting a Javelin
2:35
https://youtu.be/zZoU9BED8F0?si=FO2hrS3KZ-hSNhpJ
Anonymous No.64131480 >>64131516
Airborne IFV. Looks like 4 smaller missiles on one side and 2 bigger ones on the other
Anonymous No.64131482 >>64131516
Airborne APC with machine gun and grenade launcher
Anonymous No.64131483
Airborne mortar gun carrier
Anonymous No.64131485 >>64131516
Airborne mortar gun carrier
Anonymous No.64131487
New IFV that share the same hull as the new tank
Anonymous No.64131496 >>64131514
Why no new SPGs this time?
Anonymous No.64131499
>>64131457
China's GL-6 is kinda similar to the Trophy.

https://youtu.be/59rf5YDu3sg?si=gWAPKnDjAg0bYMHK
Anonymous No.64131505 >>64131548
>>64131106 (OP)
Ban evading shitter.

>>64131297
No, it's the same one. He's dumping the same images from his previous thread.
Anonymous No.64131514 >>64131521
>>64131496
The PLz-05 already got a minor upgrade a year or so ago.
Anonymous No.64131516 >>64131969
>>64131106 (OP)
>Which one did the next gen tank stuff better?
Poland
Equally vaporware, too. Only better!
>>64131476
>>64131480
>>64131482
>>64131485
why does chinesium chicom shit always look like a plastic toy?
this goes for everything from their rifles to their cars, plastic toy shit that hyper-focuses on kitschy looks and ignores everything that matters
Anonymous No.64131518 >>64131536 >>64131549 >>64131568 >>64131580
New PLAN missiles:
YJ-15 (Ramjet CM)
YJ-17 (HGV)
YJ-19 (Scramjet HCM)
YJ-20 (Biconical MARV)
Anonymous No.64131521 >>64131541
>>64131514
What about the new 203mm and even the rumoured EM guns?
Anonymous No.64131536 >>64131558 >>64131654
>>64131518
Fuck

YJ-19 looks mental and the YJ-15 looks like the supersonic stealth cruise missile that was rumored for long time (aka Superior Version of the LRASM)
Anonymous No.64131541
>>64131521
Dunno, haven't seen any big guns at this parade. But yet again, we havent seen all parade squadrons
Anonymous No.64131548
>>64131505
Well then he's at least not starting shit flinging, yet.
Anonymous No.64131549
>>64131518
All quad-packable on China's nuclear attack submarines.
Anonymous No.64131558
>>64131536
Yj-15 is the YJ-12 successor, aka high supersonic sea skimming cruise.

The stealth missile is the AFK-98
Anonymous No.64131568
>>64131518
YJ-15 looks like a slimmer version of the YJ-12
Anonymous No.64131580 >>64131594
>>64131518
From the three hypersonics wouldn't the YJ-17 HGV be the least powerful since it's so flat? It means that it won't have enough space for a big warhead. Both the YJ-19 and YJ-20 seem to be much better antiship missiles.
Anonymous No.64131594 >>64131634
>>64131580
Yj-17 would be a HGV aka a unpowered glider. Different engagement envelope compared to powered missiles.
Anonymous No.64131602
Feed me.
Anonymous No.64131614 >>64131623
>chink is dumping the same script again after the last shill thread was deleted
Sad life
Anonymous No.64131618
>>64131106 (OP)
Why is everyone calling it the ZTZ-201 when we have no idea what the official designation is?
Anonymous No.64131623 >>64131627
>>64131614
>Next gen weapon systems aren't interesting but we need 20 threads on slightly different cope cage designs
Anonymous No.64131626
>>64131106 (OP)
China for the simple reason that it is reasonable to believe that China can actually get their next-gen tank out of the prototype stage and into mass production.
Anonymous No.64131627
>>64131623
>Next gen weapon systems
lol
Chink dogs like you get the rope
Anonymous No.64131634 >>64131637 >>64131663
>>64131594
Still, its shape means that it won't be able to carry as big warhead as the HACM and MARV. For antiship role the warhead size is key, that's why you should laugh at anyone who claims that the SM-6 is also antiship hypersonic missile with its 64kg warhead...
Anonymous No.64131637 >>64131645
>>64131634
https://www.twz.com/land/sm-6-fired-at-target-ship-by-u-s-armys-typhon-launcher-from-down-under
Scared, chinky?
Anonymous No.64131645 >>64131654 >>64131746
>>64131637
Very scared of a missile that delivers a warhead barely more than 2x 155mm shells
Anonymous No.64131649
>>64131476
So, two crew confirmed?
Wonder what AI can now accomplish that can save a tank commander or gunner.
Anonymous No.64131654 >>64131676
>>64131645
Clearly the sm6 is living rent free in your head since you brought it up completely unprompted in your own shill thread
Hell, even the LRASM lmao >>64131536
Anonymous No.64131663 >>64131671
>>64131634
Yeah, I guess kinetic energy is the main killing device here. On the other hand, it being a glider can still potentially have the same 120kg warhead as a YJ-83, since saves the fuel space.

A 120kg semi armor piercing EFP warhead can be quite compact.
Anonymous No.64131671 >>64131743
>>64131663
Picrel, the warhead does its main damage by being an EFP that explodes around itself after penetration.
Anonymous No.64131676 >>64131681 >>64131691
>>64131654
>US "hypersonic" missile is an antiair missile with tiny warhead repurposed for "antiship" and ground attack role
>US main anti-ship missile is still a subsonic harpoon but in a body kit
>Chinese hypersonics: Scramjet HCM, HGV and MARV for both anti-ship and land attack role
Impressive
Anonymous No.64131681
>>64131676
You start to sound very butthurt chinky. Decades and chinky still can't even match the LRASM. What a shithole
Anonymous No.64131689 >>64131738 >>64131822
so is this thread one chinkshill talking to himself, or two chinkshills pretending to have an organic conversation?
Anonymous No.64131691
>>64131676
Based.
The sooner the USN acknowledges that they are a sunset navy like the British the better.
Anonymous No.64131738
>>64131689
It was originally three chinsects but one leaned back too far into a lathe.
Anonymous No.64131743
>>64131671
They really do get some mileage out of that Exocet warhead clone.
Anonymous No.64131746 >>64131897 >>64132089
>>64131645
Should be good enough to deal with tofu dreg rowboats. Provided they don't sink themselves whilst trying to bully fishermen first.
Anonymous No.64131816
>>64131106 (OP)
They aren't comparable. One is a heavy tank (seven road wheels), the other is a light thank (six road wheels).
Anonymous No.64131820
>>64131113
>>64131204
AR glasses are trash better just install good monitors.
Anonymous No.64131822
>>64131689
It's one.
Anonymous No.64131897 >>64131910 >>64131920 >>64131949
>>64131746
Oh no no no
Anonymous No.64131910
>>64131897
>One got struck by a 30,000 ton cargo ship
>The other struck a <10,000 destroyer
That is not the epic own you think it is, chang.
Anonymous No.64131920
>>64131897
You aren't fooling anyone with this image, retard.
Anonymous No.64131949
>>64131897
Did you ever have dreams of greatness and success before you got lumped with having to parrot the vernacular of a Mongolian Nickelodeon fansite for a living?
Anonymous No.64131969
>>64131516
>why does chinesium chicom shit always look like a plastic toy?
Bodykit looks implessive, and looking implessive is 90% of the aim for a face culture terrified of the thought of ever receiving a setback.
Anonymous No.64132089 >>64132093
>>64131746
Who would win? The most advanced US nuclear sub or coral reefs?
Anonymous No.64132093
>>64132089
not relevant to the absolute chink humiliation, don't try to change the subject.