Thread 64134238

I don't have an Uzi at home :(

>>64134252
I do but its semi auto. :(

>>64134238 (OP)
Uzi but not Jew

>>64134238 (OP)
Am i the only one that is mad I can't find a proper op Pic mac stock for a semi auto sbr?

>>64134482
no, I'm mad too

>mfw own the MACTASTIC>
>M10/9 to be exact
>the fcg was completely bubba'd
>therefore it only shoots in full auto, semi doesn't work, missing the trip and everything, need to source a whole new fcg
>man i really should find some spare mags while i'm at
>orders some completely overpriced recent production one which i had to fill various export forms to get here
>they sit too high in the gun the bolt slams in them instead of stripping a round
>now thinking what and where i will file to fix that

I LOVE THE MACTASTIC EXPERIENCE

>>64134238 (OP)
It's the superior choice for aesthetics.

Brrrraatt

>>64134482
Right there with ya.

>>64134595
these maps were really cool, I'l admit I played the sanitized version with Hideous Destructor, but I was still blown away by the mapping design, same goes for every installation of this series

>>64134481
>ur a fag

I'm a fan

>>64134521
nice

>>64134238 (OP)
How does she stay so thin?

why doesn't /k/ like submachine guns

>>64138297
Most /k/ommandos do not have good taste in weapons.
You do though for pulling up that beautiful MAC-10.

>>64138297
/k/ likes submachine guns. they just aren't something that civilians are able to participate in, and there really hasn't been anything new to talk about in that ballpark for the past 30 years anyway

>>64138621
Never shot an MAC-11. What's the accuracy on target like really close range = 25m? Full giggle.

>>64138906
Never shot one myself, I was just commenting on how good it looks with the SIONICS suppressor equipped.
There is a famous saying about it that it's, ''Good for combat in a phonebooth and nothing else.''

>>64138896
There hasn't been any new developments in *any* type of firearms for 50 years (AR-15, for one).
Talk about submachine guns

>"civilians participate"
Who gives a fuck. Even MG collectors don't own or have some of the most widely produced full autos

>>64138906
>>64139038
>MAC-11
That's the .380 ACP variant with 1400 cyclic rate

>>64139099
>There hasn't been any new developments in *any* type of firearms for 50 years
never go full retard

>>64139173
Gonna guess they meant these supercompact 9mm that empty the mag in 0,5s, maybe I'm completely off but is my assumption.

>>64138297
Because most of this board buys into the just make AR15s with ever shorter barrels marketing scheme. That's why in post your guns threads you will always see a flood of damn near identical guns. I am not shitting on the AR15 itself, I own one and have put more rounds through it than probably all my other guns put together, bit I recognize that it is not the best gun for every scenario, and that there are jobs it was never meant to fill. No amount of shoehorning, barrel chopping, or obscure clambering will change this fact.

>>64138297
Because we can't own them. Posting about them would be no better than faggy nogunz Yuros who have no firsthand experience yet feel compelled to post anyway.

I have shot a semi-auto cobray. It was a real piece of shit.

>>64139371
Thank you anon. You are a /k/ patriot


>the just make AR15s with ever shorter barrels marketing scheme
>That's why in post your guns threads you will always see a flood of damn near identical guns

>>64139173
>>64139191
Any of those have new mechanisms?

Beretta Px4, Grand Power are the only ones
and not substantially different from Browning-action, in other words they're not really "new" developments though yes they are different pistols than most on the present market

>>64139427
As posted above, even MG collectors lack some of the widely produced full autos
not everything posted to or discussed on /k/ has to be 'guns you own'
We all own and shoot guns. Our interest in firearms (at least mine) extends far beyond merely those

>>64139581
MG collectors have at least shot a machine gun to form an opinion about them. And former military have used machine guns (military, not ATF term) in training and live fire scenarios.

SMGs are cool, but I don't feel the need to post about something I have no experience to tell.

>>64139610
so what you're implying is that nobody uses submachine guns any more (except collectors) so there's no point?

aka submachine guns are a dodo of firearms

>>64139633
No I mean these, "discussions," are the equivalent of a nogunz spouting their opinion off on shit they have no idea what they're talking about.

>>64139638
And (You) do?

Entire internet including (You) rn is people 'spouting their opinion on shit they have no idea' about.

>>64139703
I haven't stated an opinion other than why this thread won't have interesting replies and that cobray semi autos suck.

>>64139724
Who cares what (You) think and everyone already knows that Cobray-anything sucks, has known that since the 1980s. Based on the stick-up-ass attitude we've heard enough from (You). In my humble opinion, I could be wrong

>won't have any interesting replies
Maybe, maybe not. (You)'re not king of the internet or 4chan

>>64139739
Wrong, the Cobray Streetsweeper is good. I know so from Call of Pripyat.

>MAC 10 without suppressor
>gay, lame, gangsta
>MAC 10 with suppressor
>slick, vintage black ops, action movie sexo
Is there any other firearm that has such a change in vibe with one minor attachment?

>>64139758
Some would say a 92FS with one of those AL-GI-MEC compensators has such a change with just one attachment.

>>64139748
Please accept my concession.

>>64139764
Never.
You will never force me to accept that a niche discontinued shotgun that I don't own isn't good just because it was in a video game!

>>64139769
I, too, browsed those magazines back in the day.

>>64134651
The TC itself is pretty great too, great weapon balance and fun writing. It really is a joy to explore.
One of these days I'll sit down and learn Hideous Destructor's autism, it always looks neat

Improvement on both Uzi and MAC

>>64139427
You can with a 3d printer and super safety you absolute fucking retard

>>64138297
I love how the Mac-10 looks with a suppressor and extended magazine. It's goofy but in a good way.
Also I like to imagine someone running out of ammo, grabbing it by the suppressor, and whacking people with the magazine like stick.
I think Hank from Madness Combat did that at some point with a Mac-10 so that's probably where I got that idea.

>>64143533
checked, my recall of the Ingram M10 is from 'McQ' (1974) and 'Three Days of the Condor' (1976)

U.S. specops forces used them in small numbers late 60s/early 70s in southeast Asia

>>64134238 (OP)
I want to see a full sized simple blowback 16 inch barreled bullpup mac-10 with a side charging handle and an OTs-14 Groza style buttpad. I bet it would be the shittiest rifle ever produced, and would be an uncomfortable pile of shit to shoulder and fire.

>world moves closer to cyberpunk dystopia everyday
>still no easily available machine pistols for the common man

How am I supposed to protect myself from insane chrome heads with more armor on their asses than a tank column?

>>64144344
Ah yes, let me just hop on down to my LGS and pick up a machine pistol that hasn't been in production for over a century. You don't get it, I want guns purchasable through vending machines. I want my HD gun to be a light machine gun that I didn't have to play mother may I with government cock suckers to obtain.

>>64138906
I hit squirrels out to 40-50 yards with my M11/9 with a red dot on it. Especially modern uppers can be pretty accurate, you just have to get used to the bolt dropping before the round lights off.