>>64143090 (OP)
Get lost turdie. Something big must have been hit to make the r*ccian shills this anally devastated about the UK. Sorry about your country’s inferiority to Brittania.
>>64143299
i'm legitimately wondering, the thought has been rattling in my head for the last few days now
were they being given the wrong lube, like tundra vs desert lube?
It’s very amusing how you cannot control your own shitting, now that the “white nationalist” rhetoric you came up with to groom American threat actors is used to radicalize those same people against Russian influence. An absolute class act by the lads.
>>64143351 >>64143356 >NOOO KUMRADE YOU R BROWN UNLIKE ME >is a slightly lighter shade of shitskin
Why are ziggers and their vassal dwellers like this?
>>64143358 >>64143376 >u see ivan if i blatantly lie then NATO will not understand what i say
The empire of losers is dying, and soon there will be none of your wretched kind left.
>>64143376
You are not a victim
Anyone posting seethe about the UK is automatically assumed to be Russian until proven otherwise. And you proved that you are. Now scurry along little glavset.
>>64143383
almost feel bad for the p*ccians and their crumbling empire, having to deal with their historical rival Great Britain leaving them in the dust
>>64143336
Seconding. I've never actually really heard of Gibbs, or at least more likely, paid attention. When I was starting out on guns I was told to use Slip2000, Hoppe's 9 all that normal shit.
Speaking of that, has anyone here actually used Gibbs intentionally?
Do you think we could summon lubeanon to give us his autism on it?
>>64143391
thanks
its one of those old timer trick lubes, rare, yet apparently extremely good
i'm just wondering what the issue was with their lube
its been fixed now (i assume), but i'd like to know what the problem was in the first place
can any britanons who served or any anons who got hold of the lube share any info?
>>64143484
oh no, i'm asking about a lube from 14 years ago!!!!
how will the british EVER recover from such a question????
this truly is the greatest defeat.. its so over, just, so, over........
>>64143406 >i'm just wondering what the issue was with their lube
There probably wasn't one. This smells like marketing. Notice the letter starts out talking about "our recent discussion". That probably went something like this: >Oi m8, if you write me a note on your regimental letterhead about how great Gibbs oil is I'll make sure you can have another go with the missus. Make sure you use the phrase "Gibbs Brand Lubricant" exactly. >Jolly good
>>64143612
The only people who care about trademarks are marketing shills.
>>64143739
If he were writing to someone else in the Army, sure. But the sole reason this letter exists is because Duncan asked homeboy to write it. Feel free to speculate on the reason, but I think it's obvious.
