← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 64143595

77 posts 16 images /k/
Anonymous No.64143595 >>64143600 >>64143643 >>64143651 >>64143670 >>64143701 >>64143895 >>64144039 >>64144112 >>64144261 >>64144557 >>64144646 >>64145235 >>64147654 >>64147671 >>64148529 >>64148562 >>64148616 >>64150474 >>64150496 >>64153133 >>64153880 >>64154140
Let's say some asshole like Rampage Jackson comes to you and, unprovoked, says he's going to kick your ass begins to get physical. You stand no chance in a fist fight and it's very likely he'll cause some serious bodily harm.

Is it justified to pull a firearm (and possibly shoot) in a situation when someone has a massive size advantage or has a background in combat sports?
Anonymous No.64143600 >>64143622 >>64143895
>>64143595 (OP)
If they are starting shit it's justified no matter who they are or what size they are
Anonymous No.64143604 >>64143628
if you dont beat the self defense charge, well at least you aint dead.
Anonymous No.64143622 >>64143651 >>64143895 >>64144218
>>64143600
I don't think that's accurate. If it were a normal person wouldn't be considered escalation?
Anonymous No.64143628
>>64143604
I mean there isn't proof he'll kill you. You just assume the worst
Anonymous No.64143643 >>64143725
>>64143595 (OP)
does he know what a 45-70 is?
Anonymous No.64143651 >>64143773 >>64144562 >>64144669
>>64143595 (OP)
There's no clear answer to this, but yeah, this is the exact shit that you discuss in CCW classes. If a power imbalance exists, like you're outnumbered or perhaps there's one opponent but he's much bigger/stronger than you then then the law is likely on your side. But really this is hard to discuss without specifics.

>>64143622
>If it were a normal person wouldn't be considered escalation?
Where is this hypothetical situation taking place, so you can go look up the law?
Anonymous No.64143670
>>64143595 (OP)
>Your honor, he told me he was going to kill me.
Anonymous No.64143676
>Put distance beetwen you and him
>Grab the first thing around, preferibly a blunt object
>Throw it at him or swing it wildly if it has reach
If hes going to beat you like this he could atill kill you before you take out your gun.
Dont make me post gore to prove jt
Anonymous No.64143701 >>64143717 >>64143794
>>64143595 (OP)
It depends on the state. Depends on what you mean by physical. In some areas you have a responsibility to flee if at all possible. Did he push you and yell? In some states no. Did he yell I'm going to kill you mutherfucker and come at you. Then yeah you will probably get away with that one.
>>massive size advantage
204 isn't that big. Neither is 6' 1" Rampage was a bad choice of example. Hes going to look pretty normal to a jury deciding if you were justified. Especially if you lift weights or exercise at all.
Anonymous No.64143717 >>64143757
>>64143701
>204 isn't that big
We have no idea what OP's age or physical condition is. An average person is a threat if you're young, old, weak...
Anonymous No.64143725
>>64143643
Lmao was waiting for this
Anonymous No.64143730
>You stand no chance in a fist fight
What if I’m Jon Jones tho?
Anonymous No.64143757
>>64143717
Learn to swim. Especially if you are going to jump into circular arguments clueless.
Its holding your people back. For real, learn to swim already.
Anonymous No.64143760
IIRC yes you are justified, if the force disparity produced by size is obvious and if you have foreknowledge of his martial arts background. If a guy is your size and attacks you, you shoot him, and find out later he’s a black belt in some discipline, that won’t fly. You had to know before you shot him.
Anonymous No.64143773
>>64143651
I appreciate it. Should have stayed in school I guess.
Anonymous No.64143794 >>64143865
>>64143701
I was just watching some videos of Rampage being a fucker and wanted to shoot him.
Anonymous No.64143799
64143757
>Maybe if I call him black he'll forget my retardation
No. You don't even deserve a "you".
Anonymous No.64143865
>>64143794
I remember when he was preparing to fight chuck and Rogan was talking to him on some video and he is powering down a steak and cheese laughing about making weight.
Resident Wumbologist !!aZ2iZUdyUbF No.64143895
>>64143595 (OP)
It generally depends on the legal jurisdiction because the threshold of what is considered a credible threat of death or serious bodily injury varies from place to place. This is usually a matter of state law and if not written clearly there is case law surrounding the issue.

In broad overview, somebody much stronger than the person being attacked is typically considered to be a significantly greater physical threat whereas an unarmed attacker of equal or lesser physical strength isn't.
>>64143600
>>64143622
In most pro 2A states if you didn't start it then it doesn't matter if the attacker is some 89lb DYEL. They are attacking you and you are covered by a stand your ground law, because even a weak person can potentially knock you over and you can bust your hand open on the ground, or grab your weapon, or produce a weapon that you can't see yet.

If it's a state with restrictive gun laws and overall weak 2A rights, it could be a different story. You could be prosecuted and the disparity of available force can come into question, even if you were purely defending yourself. In some cases even if you are in a wheelchair and the attacker is jacked, the prosecutor can argue that you shot an unarmed man but that argument would probably not sway the jury.
Anonymous No.64144039
>>64143595 (OP)
Obviously the situation dicates if you can do this but first run away as much as you can if he gives chase then brandish your weapon and yell at him to stop or you will shoot. If he still continues then open fire. All but the most cucked states will let you go.
Anonymous No.64144112 >>64144306
>>64143595 (OP)
*flips on MRI machine*
heh...nuthin personnel
Anonymous No.64144218 >>64148530 >>64153912
>>64143622
plenty of people have died from a sucker punch, also you dont know if they are armed or not
you should attempt to de-escalate and leave but if they don't let you, its fair game
Anonymous No.64144261 >>64144407
>>64143595 (OP)
They literally go over this in any short lecture on self defense law, you could have googled this and fucked off. we have no idea what country or jurisdiction you're under. Massive fucking faggot, i hope rampage jackson disarms your ass and reams your cloaca out until you're more donut than human. get raped and pissed on.
Anonymous No.64144306 >>64146087
>>64144112
Wasn't that the one where everyone involved was a nigger, and too stupid to slap the emergency halt button that kills power to the machine instantly?
Anonymous No.64144338
I train in pipebomb jutsu anyway
Anonymous No.64144407 >>64145238
>>64144261
>OP makes innocuous thread
>someone is 110% ass blasted
I didn't ask for these powers
Anonymous No.64144529
I strip my clothes off, dig into my asshole, and smear shit over myself. Would anyone bother to kick my ass after that?
Anonymous No.64144557
>>64143595 (OP)
i'd simply cross the street to avoid that potential ruffian experience. (never relax)
Anonymous No.64144562
>>64143651
Biggest legal win in manlet history
Anonymous No.64144571 >>64144773
cell phone recording of his threat proceeded by a single shot doming off camera

>b-b-b-

Shut up, acquitted of all charges
Anonymous No.64144646
>>64143595 (OP)
i call over ariel helwani to draw aggro
Anonymous No.64144669 >>64144701 >>64147212
>>64143651
Correct me if I’m wrong but doesn’t the law also assume a force disparity by default between a man and woman? Like if a man attacks a woman, then regardless of size difference or weapons used, the woman is always justified in defending with lethal force. Doesn’t matter if it’s a top percentile 6’2” bodybuilder MMA fighter woman vs a skinnyfat male manlet.
Anonymous No.64144701 >>64144764 >>64147212
>>64144669
I think this has more to do with cultural norms and (Lord forgive me) gender roles than actual case law. But essentially, yes.
Anonymous No.64144764 >>64147212
>>64144701
It is a good rule of thumb though. I mean they’re not wrong, but it probably still ought to be considered on a case-by-case basis. Like in my absurd example, the girl probably isn’t justified In killing the guy. But imagine hearing that in court. “So the victim who was shot is a tiny manlet who obviously can not kill the defendant (a girl) with his bare hands, thus she could have defended herself using hands and feet.
Anonymous No.64144773
>>64144571
still stuck in my head to this day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSBafi8WpS4
Anonymous No.64145235
>>64143595 (OP)
>Let's say....
bang bang bang bang.....bang (just to be sure)
what was your question?
Anonymous No.64145238 >>64147122
>>64144407
>referring to yourself in 3rd person
Look, I'm just calling you a fag which you clearly are. It's my duty.
Anonymous No.64145867 >>64150513
This is a stealth cuck thread and I'm not going to pretend it isn't
Anonymous No.64146087
>>64144306
Apparently it took hours to remove him so this was probably one of the permanent magnet machines.
Anonymous No.64147122
>>64145238
It's obvious you desperately want a homoerotic companion or else you wouldn't be thinking about rape and gay sex this whole time. Let the closet door swing open and be proud of who you are.
Anonymous No.64147212 >>64147820
>>64144669
>>64144701
>>64144764
Idk what the law says but in my experience women can pretty much do whatever the fuck they want to someone for whatever psychotic reason is floating around their lizard brain and then justify it by claiming to be afraid after the fact and get off nearly Scott free. Most of the time when you see a story of a woman killing the bf/husband "in self defense" it's a case of her having an irrational emotional tantrum and then being smart enough to keep her mouth shut until a lawyer shows up and argues "self defense."
T. It's happened to me.
Anonymous No.64147654 >>64147871
>>64143595 (OP)
All professional fighters hands are registered as legal weapons, if you shot him while he is being aggressive and charging you then you will be out soon as trial is convened. Only thing I always hated about these laws is that you lose your job and are set back in life so much even if you are innocent and were attacked.
Anonymous No.64147671 >>64147862
>>64143595 (OP)
look up disparity of force. mossad ayoob has some videos on it
Anonymous No.64147820 >>64148516 >>64152879
>>64147212
So you were murdered by a woman, but got better?
Anonymous No.64147862
>>64147671
Ahh yes taking advice from a retired part timenew Hampshire cop. Brilliant. Hes definitely an expert on everything he blathers about. The guy took the least amount of experience you could possibly have in the safest place you could get it (part time mind you) and squeezed the absolute fuck out of it.
Anonymous No.64147871 >>64150304
>>64147654
>>All professional fighters hands are registered as legal weapons
You can't be fucking serious
Anonymous No.64148516 >>64152879 >>64152993
>>64147820
No but I have had one get violent with me using weapons including guns with no provocation and then play the victim when the cops show up. And in the aftermath I also experienced how the cops will do nothing to investigate the males side of the story and simply jail him because an angry drunk woman made false claims of abuse.
Anonymous No.64148529 >>64148535
>>64143595 (OP)
no he can fight me and beat me 1v1. but im coming back with 5 buddies with bats and knives
Anonymous No.64148530 >>64150428 >>64152975
>>64144218
>plenty of people have died from a sucker punch
name 5
its like gettIng struck by lightning
Anonymous No.64148535
>>64148529
Anonymous No.64148562
>>64143595 (OP)
Rampage is a weeb, you could probably freeze him up by asking rei vs asuka, giving you enough time to draw youd ccw
Anonymous No.64148616
>>64143595 (OP)
i'd take him to pound town
that buck
would be broken
Anonymous No.64150304
>>64147871
>registered as lethal weapons

This sounds plausible if you’re 10. I remember believing it when I was a kid
Anonymous No.64150428
>>64148530
NTA. Is that so unlikely though? A full power punch to the face of an unsuspecting person could kill him. It’s not unheard of. Just the blow itself could be lethal, and especially the impact of his head on concrete after he falls down.

T. Seen tons of videos of a pack of niggers sucker punching unsuspecting whites (they call this “fighting”). The whites fall unconscious, either before or after the fall. There must be a nontrivial chance of death anytime someone is knocked unconscious by a blow to the head. That’s the brain being subjected to more acceleration than it can withstand.
Anonymous No.64150474 >>64150496
>>64143595 (OP)
>Let's say some retarded scenario I made up
duty to retreat unless a wild nigger magically appears inside your house
>massive size advantage or has a background in combat sports
irrelevant
Anonymous No.64150496 >>64151176
>>64150474
>>64143595 (OP)
forgot pic
Anonymous No.64150513
>>64145867
Didnt ask you
Anonymous No.64151176 >>64152758
>>64150496
Soooo what's the verdict on this?
Anonymous No.64152758
>>64151176
Nigger shit
Anonymous No.64152879 >>64152898 >>64152947
>>64147820
>>64148516

This. It's called the "pussy pass" for a reason. The legal policy is called the "Duluth Model"; yes it was invented by a feminist, yes it was adopted with zero thought to equal protection under the law, and no the lawyers and judges don't care that's blatantly illegal.

Basically, it states that the woman is always the victim and the male is always the aggressor under all circumstances. You can even watch BWC footage of DV cases where the woman is unhinged and the cops treat the guy like he's the aggressor, because it's standard police policy to do so. It's insane to watch cops treat the male victim like he's simultaneously a gigantic pussy for not fighting back but also abusive because "he must have done something" to get such a reaction from his partner.
Anonymous No.64152898
>>64152879
It's completely insane and a lot of people don't believe it until it happens to them
Anonymous No.64152947 >>64152962
>>64152879
From the Wikipedia page

Others criticize the Duluth Model as being overly confrontational rather than therapeutic, focusing solely on changing the abuser's actions and attitudes rather than dealing with underlying emotional and psychological issues.[30] Donald Dutton, a psychology professor at the University of British Columbia who has studied abusive personalities, states: "The Duluth Model was developed by people who didn't understand anything about therapy."[23] Dutton also observes that "lesbian battering is more frequent than heterosexual battering".[31] Philip W. Cook comments that in the case of homosexual domestic violence, the patriarchy is absent: there is no male dominance of women in same-sex relationships, and in fact female on female abuse is reported more than twice as frequently as male on male abuse.[32] Furthermore, some critics argue that the model ignores the reality that women can be the perpetrators of domestic violence in heterosexual relationships. Its proponents counter that the Duluth model is effective and makes best use of scarce resources.

Basically they tacitly admit that women are more often the perpetrators of dv as you can see from the studies on dikes but they still insist on punishing men because... patriarchy!...
Anonymous No.64152962
>>64152947
Pt 2

Ellen Pence, co-founder of the DAIP, writes:

By determining that the need or desire for power was the motivating force behind battering, we created a conceptual framework that, in fact, did not fit the lived experience of many of the men and women we were working with. The DAIP staff ... remained undaunted by the difference in our theory and the actual experiences of those we were working with ... It was the cases themselves that created the chink in each of our theoretical suits of armor. Speaking for myself, I found that many of the men I interviewed did not seem to articulate a desire for power over their partner. Although I relentlessly took every opportunity to point out to men in the groups that they were so motivated and merely in denial, the fact that few men ever articulated such a desire went unnoticed by me and many of my coworkers. Eventually, we realized that we were finding what we had already predetermined to find.

Bitch who started this horseshit admits she's just a lying misandrist whos goal was to portray men as violent (even though as we saw in the dyke study in pt1 women are far more frequently the perpetrators and initiators of violence within intimate relationships). Unfortunately she only fessed up well after the entire country decided to alter their policing to accommodate this dogshit pseudoscience.
Anonymous No.64152973
Speak vietnamese to him so he knows I'm chill
Anonymous No.64152975 >>64153097
>>64148530
go to any popular bar, then ask the bartender/bouncer
people get got all the time
Anonymous No.64152993 >>64153045
>>64148516
Why, one would almost think that powerful cops are a bad thing that the Founders warned us against!
Anonymous No.64153045
>>64152993
Yeah no shit...
Anonymous No.64153097 >>64153930
>>64152975
Old wives tales
Anonymous No.64153133
>>64143595 (OP)
announcing a threat of violence is the same as assault and can be dealt with accordingly. if a judge saw my tiny, lithe twink little body and this man's monstrous, muscular corpse with a neat little .32 sized hole in his head he's going to throw the case like it had shit smeared on it.
Anonymous No.64153880
>>64143595 (OP)
I carry pepper spray for situations like this. I've seen enough videos of people dying. Sometimes all it takes is one punch, your head hits the ground and you're dead.
Anonymous No.64153912 >>64154130
>>64144218
That's assuming they stop at 1 punch which makes no logical sense to assume. You don't even need to be knocked out, you can be disoriented for a second and that's enough for him to land another punch then another punch suddenly you're on the ground and he's stomping on your head. Or they don't punch you, they tackle you and slam the back of your head against the ground. Or he punches you and you punch back and they pull out a gun/knife and now you're dead.
Anonymous No.64153930
>>64153097
it literally isn't
drinking dehydrates you, shrinking your brain; when you fall, you have more space to rattle your brain
take your nofists ass out of here
Anonymous No.64154130
>>64153912
I wish he'd have beat the woman too. Might as well at that point.
Anonymous No.64154140 >>64157493
>>64143595 (OP)
Why would Rampage Jackson ever start shit with me man? He's one of the coolest dudes alive.
Anonymous No.64157486
bump
Anonymous No.64157493
>>64154140
have you seen his irl streaming career? all he does is start shit wIth people