← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 64161724

33 posts 10 images /k/
Anonymous No.64161724 >>64161725 >>64161738 >>64161758 >>64161813
This nigga has 1.5 million subscribers and he could milk his youtube channel for money and become a millionaire. But he doesn't do anything to make money on his channel.
Anonymous No.64161725 >>64161731
>>64161724 (OP)
Weapons?
Anonymous No.64161731 >>64161738 >>64161741
>>64161725
His videos are about weapons and combat, and he gives many first hand accounts of combat
Anonymous No.64161738 >>64161871
>>64161724 (OP)
>>64161731
who is he?
Anonymous No.64161741 >>64161746
>>64161731
This thread is about him not using his YT to make money. So again: Weapons?
Anonymous No.64161746 >>64161813
>>64161741
Using his channel to make money would involve shilling gear, like doing a product placement of a helmet saying it took a rifle round and saved his life.
Anonymous No.64161758 >>64161770 >>64162145
>>64161724 (OP)
25 million views of videos is "only" worth 125k dollars with today's natural ad revenue return. And that's before costs, taxes, etc.
There are tons and tons of "million plus subs" channels that only get 30-60k views per vid. 90 vids a year is 20 grand USD - before costs.

And before anyone says
>this channel has this x subs and this x views per vid blahblahblah
Most of those people are trying to run a company through youtube. 100k a month, again before costs, doesn't go far if you have an editor, advert company taking cut, and 7 employees.
I mean aside from the FACT most channels are botted sub counts, fake sub counts, fake views, a ton of that is not real payout.

>millilnaire
Lol. Lmao.
Youtube millionaires are a combination of lucky and cock sucking, probably legitimate cock sucking, and scamming their viewers.
Anonymous No.64161770 >>64161807
>>64161758
The real money would be him doing product placements for gear, courses, and merchandise. Adsense is nothing in comparison.
Anonymous No.64161807 >>64161817 >>64161831
>>64161770
Bah. 15k sub channels get the same pay offers as 250k channels. The pay doesn't scale linear either. WhistlinDiesel doesn't get offered a 500 grand advert pay for a plug when some lowname channel of 28k subs is offered $1200. No, they pay diesel 20 grand.

Again in reality the money isn't really what most people think. Same reason that absolute nigger Logan Paul ran 40 fucking crypto scams. You think he didn't want the profit because he didnt need it? No that nigger needed 40 crypto scams to have the money cover his dumbass business expansion dreams. He didn't make bazamillions from those fights, lmao, and probably needed those monies to cover his previous scams from becoming public legal problems.

Reality is very very dirty.
Anonymous No.64161813 >>64162381
>>64161724 (OP)
>>64161746
is it so hard for zoomers to understand that nobody gives a fuck about their youtubers?
Anonymous No.64161817 >>64161824
>>64161807
Think about what you're saying.
>WhistlinDiesel doesn't get offered a 500 grand advert pay for a plug when some lowname channel of 28k subs is offered $1200. No, they pay diesel 20 grand.
So, some lowname channel with 28k subs would get the same 20k deal as WhistlinDiesel?
Anonymous No.64161824 >>64161872
>>64161817
Holy shit you're dumb.
Anonymous No.64161831
>>64161807
>Reality is very, very dirty
This man is on the moolah. Take the armor industry for example. That entire industry is dirty as shit, youtube especially. Every armor company has had a scandal or a skeleton in the closet. Many have several. Just about every big name youtuber who tests armor sold out at some point.
This goes for guns, NV, and other accessories too. People have bills to pay and need side hustles to stay afloat. Taking advantage of others' obsessive need to spend money is a gold mine.
MandiΔ‡.iz.čusta.jebe.NAFO-jews.u.usta No.64161871 >>64162004 >>64162371
>>64161738

Dead nigger walking.
Anonymous No.64161872 >>64161877 >>64161902
>>64161824
Product placement deals do scale up with the number of viewers. To suggest otherwise is absurd. Someone with 10 million subscribers won't be paid the same in an ad deal as someone with 100k subscribers.

The reality is, though, these numbers aren't exact, someone with 100k subs would get deals like $500-$1000 per product placement ad, so they would be getting $500-$1000 at the contracted rate, the vast majority of time being per video with however many times they contracted for the ad to be featured in videos. So if the youtuber with 100k subs runs the ad 5 times, they'd be making $2500-$5000.

Now, this scales up with the number of subscribers. Someone with 10 million subscribers will be pulling $100,000 - $250,000 per product placement ad. Probably more in the middle like $150,000. But it depends as well what kind of ad it is. Some pay higher than others, and some play less.

Civ Div, if he were shilling gear every video would be making between $5,000-$15,000 per every product placement in his videos. Tat's just produce placement. Youtubers have other revenues than just that.

Then, take in account he could have been doing this for the last 5 years. He could have easily become a millionaire. Are you so short sighted that you believe the only way anyone can become a millionaire is over night? Someone making $10,000 a week would take around 4 years to become a millionaire to give a good estimate. I make this estimate after taxes and expenses.
Anonymous No.64161877
>>64161872
Calm down GarandThumb I wasn't calling out your adherence to the Sonora Institute scam.
Anonymous No.64161902 >>64161942 >>64161950
>>64161872
Holy shit listen to yourself
>company X can justify paying XYZ youtube channels hundreds of thou for every single vid they make
No. Nope. No way.
The advert contract would list a monthly rate of so many thous per time period (be it single, tens, or hundreds) for a certain period of months and certain amount of regular vids, viewership dependant.

You can go ahead and find videos of people showing how this all works. It is in no way nor can it ever be,
>X brand channel makes 100 thousand dollars EVERY video EVERY time for a 30 second name drop
Never how its worked, will never be how it works. Cannot work like that. Financially impossible.
Anonymous No.64161942 >>64161954
>>64161902
https://www.creatorsjet.com/blog/how-much-do-brands-pay-for-youtube-sponsorships

Creatorsjet is a marketing platform for analytics and data for content creators, not just some random blog.
Anonymous No.64161950 >>64161959
>>64161902
https://www.creatorsjet.com/blog/how-much-do-brands-pay-for-youtube-sponsorships

Creatorsjet is a marketing platform for analytics and data for content creators, not just some random blog. It's a large company that's directly involved in the marketing industry.
Anonymous No.64161954
>>64161942
Absolute bullshit numbers you indian scammer piece of shit.
Anonymous No.64161959 >>64161979
>>64161950
Absolute fucking garbage bullshit numbers.
Anonymous No.64161979 >>64161981 >>64161989
>>64161959
I gave you a source for my claims, a source that is intimately involved in influencer marketing, and they're giving numbers similar to what I claimed. You haven't given any source for your claim that product placement ads pay the same money regardless of viewer or subscriber count.
Anonymous No.64161981
>>64161979
You didnt give any source you gave some bulshiiter website.
Anonymous No.64161989 >>64162043
>>64161979
A source would be a youtube channel disclosing their advertiser solicitations, and real Adsense cent-per-vire metrics.

I already know for a fact the average CPV is about 0.005.
Anonymous No.64162004
>>64161871
when will you kill yourself serbscum?
Anonymous No.64162043 >>64162048
>>64161989
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/research-and-data/online-research/online-nation/2024/online-nation-2024-report.pdf?v=386238
>Influencer marketing spend continues to grow, with rates typically scaling by audience size. Data from industry partners shows creators with over one million subscribers can command fees many times higher than those with under 100,000, even when engagement rates are similar.
Anonymous No.64162048 >>64162068
>>64162043
Ok nigggeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Anonymous No.64162068 >>64162185
>>64162048
It's a remark in an industry research report which shouldn't even be needed for proof of anything since anyone with common sense would realise that advertising deals scale up with audience size. It confirms everything I said, and it's contrary to everything you said.
Anonymous No.64162145
>>64161758
>and 7 employees
Simple, don't have 7 employees
Anonymous No.64162185
>>64162068
>a no source source agrees with everything I said!
I live in China and the Chinese government said they dont execute anybody and we all get paid really super high good salaries and life is perfect.
Anonymous No.64162371 >>64162376
>>64161871
Shouldn't you be downloading interracial pornography?
Anonymous No.64162376
>>64162371
Anonymous No.64162381
>>64161813
Yes. It's their only "friends". Their mom's phone was their babysitter, and the YTers their only interaction with a human.