Thread 64198464

we need to add more bigger external fuel tanks to this thing

>>64198464 (OP)
dont be antisemitic anon

>>64198469
is it really a fighter plane if you dont need full blast afterburner + 20km of runway to take off?
it needs MORE FUEL TANKS

>>64198464 (OP)
Futa Israeli jets

>>64198464 (OP)
No

But we need to add tanks that make the shape more female and therefore sexier

>>64198464 (OP)
Here you go bro now yeet WSO and and some more fuel

>>64198464 (OP)
Okay, now hear me out..
What if.. we make a fuel tank in the shape of an airplane?

>>64202323
how about some on top of the wing too and more/bigger conformal tanks

>>64202358
they even made a fuel tank with a jet engine and wings

>>64202373
AH
They beat me to it!

>>64202406
wait until they add weapons and a cockpit to it

>>64202364
Best i can do bro she can't take it anymore

>>64202456
damn thats good
those elevators will take like 2 minutes to turn and allow the plane to lift with fuel attached to them. those big con formals are beaufitul imagine the range.
this thing can take off in tel aviv and strike beijing

>>64202422
Sounds very Russian, honestly.
I was gonna say Japanese but then I remembered they don't have any balls anymore

>>64198464 (OP)
>more bigger
ESL

>>64198464 (OP)
Yemen and lran is very far away

>>64202792
F16 should be able to take off in tel aviv, drop bombs on caracas and go back home without aerial refueling dependence.

> that much extra drag and weight for no lift

just make a biplane fr fr

>>64198464 (OP)
None of the USAF F-16's have CFT's installed, but the newer D models have the big spine

>>64198464 (OP)
I know a US pilot that was hired to deliver those

>>64198464 (OP)
>add more bigger
jeetsrael isn't sending its best

>>64198464 (OP)
Have it tow a drop tank-glider

>>64202456
damn negro, any photoshop tips this looks legit

>>64202799
What did Venezuela do?

>>64198464 (OP)
We've already got these hideous Conformal Fuel Tanks. Anymore and you won't have any capacity left for weapons.
> more bigger
Oof, English fail.

>>64202456
kek

>>64202456
there are two more hardpoints on wings, add more fuel tanks

>>64205934
Like this?
>>64203890
There is nothing to it you just select and copy

>>64206056
please put a jerrycan in the cockpit you know the red ones for gardening equipment

>>64206056
Yes, this is way better. Can we move the hardpoints closer, so that it has 8 tanks on wings, instead of 6?

>>64206149
Looks scuffed but it works
>>64206242
Not sure if it’s going to end up looking goofy, but i can try

>>64206319
>Looks scuffed but it works
magnificent anon thanks

>>64206242
This looks unhinged

>>64206415
Damn...

try mounting them on top of the wing

>>64206442
Can’t, I’d need a different asset.

Conformal tank the conformal tanks

>>64198464 (OP)
No Pierce. Jet is fine as is. Go watch Airbus Beluga porn.

>>64206524
vgh...

mein sides

>>64206713
lmao great minds think alike

>>64206713
Radar delete for extra fuel is a nice touch

>>64206319
this looks perfect
>>64206415
this looks like you're joking, what's next fuel tanks for the fuel tanks?

>>64206415
double the fuel tanks on "rear wings"

>>64198464 (OP)
In all seriousness, why do they do this? Doesn't the iaf have kc-135s?

>>64207867
lots of loiter time over the target is essential for hunting enemies it takes time to spot them, also missions get updated/redirected in real time all the time you cant plan a strike 3h ahead of time by the time you arrive the target isnt there but 10 others might be detected so you need maximum flexibility to change plans on the fly

>>64206675
Fuck I'm rock hard now, dont stop

>>64207900
Also it looks really fucking sexy

>>64207959
I can appreciate the curves(love handles)

>>64207867
If all you are doing with the plane is strike missions then the kinematic penalties are unimportant and this gives the plane the ability to bomb without an entire refueling plane involved. It just enhances the plane for the cost of plumbing and tanks, why not?

They could of just made it a little bigger like this.

>>64198464 (OP)
if rumors are true they not only added external drop tanks to the f35 but also conformal fuel tanks extending the rank to insane levels, considering the f35 already has a massive range relative to the previous 1 engine jet.

>>64206773
I reckon this baby can bomb the Moon and go back with fuel to spare.

>>64213725
honestly they need to drop the kerosene meme and just make the next gen of fighters run on U235

>>64213735
Could nuclear jet propulsion be viable for drones, since you don't have a crew that needs radiation shielding?

>>64198464 (OP)

How much does it lose in supersonic performance with these fuel tanks?

>haha bomb Beijing and Venezuela amirite Mr. America?
The jew ITT is really pathetic with his extremely transparent servility and hasbara astroturf, especially knowing that the Israelis are more likely to land their F-16's on a silver platter in Beijing and walk away with a briefcase full of money and human organs.

>>64215096
wrong board, nu/pol/ is down the hall and to the left.

>>64215096
Ya gotta go back