>>64204907
>The topic was injected by the OP
Nah.
>>64204910
>Is rearmament not weapons related?
Sure.
> Is the trigger for said rearmament also not weapons related?
No. See
>>63603106
If you want to talk about politics, go to /pol/. If you want to actually talk about the weapons involved, you can do it here. How is that difficult for your to understand?
Anon brought up several weapon systems. If you wanna talk about the war, talk about how they interact with the weapon systems of the enemy. Don't talk about the political background that has no bearing on those weapon systems.
E.g.
>the T34 was good design in 1941, hampered by Russian retardation
>/k/ topics include the specifics of the tank, how it was used, which weaknesses it had and how those weaknesses came about
>/pol/ topics include a debate about the moral turpitude of communism compared to your political system of choice
Can you bring up that communism is evil? Sure. Should you make a thread called "COMMUNISM IS EVIL" on /k/?
No.
Should you enter a thread about soviet Russia and keep posting about communism is evil instead of talking about guns and war?
No.
Should you enter any WWII thread that slightly touches on the soviets to spam about soviets being evil?
No.
Do you understand the difference now?
This is a board for weapons and warfare. Not politics. Rules were loosened when the war started because talk about it wasn't really preventable with all the tourists coming here. Then it was confined to a general. Then the general was also removed and put back on /pol/ where belongs. The whole point of all of that was to return to the slightly more civilized and on-topic /k/ we knew and loved.
Now it's still humming in the background, sure and I don't mind people bringing it up or mentioning it, but you have to realize that your kind is explicitly not welcome here and the sticky exists for a reason. It's because this is /k/ and not /pol/.
I tried treating you like a human being, let's see if it helped.
