Thread 64246694

Ummm, is this normal for allies to do to each other?
Some kind of college fraternity prank or what?

>>64246694 (OP)
Don't bong planes have drogue refuelling hoses

>>64246726
Yes, bong planes can't refuel Israeli F-35s. OP is a retard.

The perfidious Albion!

>>64246726
Yes but you don't need facts to get in the way of propaganda. 99.9% of people will see that image and believe it, they won't need anything annoying such as technical information to get in the way of shit.

>>64246726
>>64246733

Okay, so it didn't refuel F-35s, but this is ADR flight recorder data. The tankers took off, pre-emptively, and landed after the air attacks.

is this normal?

Is it normal to pay America for military protection, and then being attacked by a weird small sect of small hat people who control America?

>>64246758
>aircraft is on ground
>get off ground before attack so the attackers can see your transponder and know you're not an enemy aircraft coming to intercept
>circle until attack is done
>land at airbase
What should they have done? Stayed on the airfield and risk damage from munitions? It's an expensive bit of kit.

>>64246726
Yep. We're the only A330 MRTT operator with no refuelling boom to refuel American-designed aircraft, including our own C-17s, P-8s and upcoming E-7s - it's frankly embarrassing but in this instance helpfully debunks thirdies.

It's literally impossible for the RAF to refuel F-35A, F-16I, F-15I or any combat aircraft Israel currently operates.

>>64246758
They solved Qatar squatter problem, if you think they are mad or care about palis, you are too naive.

>>64246782
>'re the only A330 MRTT operator with no refuelling boom
Didn't they fit booms to the Voyager sometime after 2016? That's when they were upgrading them or said they were. So it is possible.

>>64246758
Shut the fuck up and read Jane's, faggot.
And don't come back till you've finished ALL of them.

>>64246758
>The tankers took off, pre-emptively, and landed after the air attacks.

They took off and refuelled the RAF and Qatari jets that they're there to support as part of a joint exercise.
Believe it or not, life was going on as normal because nobody had a fucking clue jews were gonna jew

>>64246808
No. It's never been funded to refit them for booms in any way and no RAF Voyager tanker has ever carried a boom, nor do they plan to.
Instead we will be relying on US tankers and NATO's MRTTs to support our planes that need boom refuelling

UAE and Saudi A330s are more likely to have refuelled Israeli jets than British ones

>>64246834
So Israeli just flew combat ops in the midst of a joint alliance exercise?

Is that normal or safe? Were the allies informed there would be an air attack on their own domicile?

>>64246758
Nigger is coping so much bringing up fantasy scenarios. They let this happen because hamas are a bunch of niggers, clear and simple.

>>64246886
If you bothered to read ANY fucking news article you would get these answers.

>>64246907
No I don't read Kosher media, just primary sources.