>>64379836 (OP)
No. Any incident of 'civil disagreement' will inevitably involve the Police, as your more organized enemies snitch on you for 'brandishing' it or 'discharging' it. Even if you kill one of them, their goal has been accomplished.
In but a few hours, an armed group of 'Policemen' will arrive to you and will, without compromise, attempt to disarm you and kidnap you. If you resist, they'll kill you.
Even if the organized group lost a member doing this to you, they still succeeded as now you're out of position, the government took away your guns for 'investigation', and you can no longer protect your domicile or your family.
As a result, your enemies will attack again, now striking at your valuables instead of you. Bonus points if the state actually convicts you for something felony-like so you can't even own any guns anymore.
All of this happened because you thought that a firearm is some kind of cone of protection that immunizes you from conflict, as opposed to an advantage that your enemies will attempt to negate.
The only way to succeed is if your opposition suddenly met an anonymous assailant and were cut down to a man. The investigators are baffled by the attacker's skillful use of a .32 lorcin. You are baffled too, as you've never met any of these people, own exclusively mossy-oak painted 12Gs, and were out of town on a vacation when it happened. Even if they, unjustly and immorally, begin proceedings against you, at least your family and assets are no longer threatened.
