Thread 64383875

Why dont russia use these chinese robots to operate behind enemy lines instead of sending their manpower into the meat grinder?

>inb4 cost
They're not that expensive, 4 or 5 figures at best. Its less expensive than paying life pension to a disabled soldier or their families.

>>64383875 (OP)
>paying a pension
lol, lmao

>>64383875 (OP)
>They're not that expensive, 4 or 5 figures at best
how much do you think a russian costs?
also those chinese robots have no military use yet.

>>64383875 (OP)
>according to the latest findings from Australian Strategic Policy Institute's (ASPI) Critical Technology Tracker, which evaluates 64 critical technology categories across 8 domains (e.g., artificial intelligence and robotics), show that China leading in 57, while the United States leads in only 7 technologies
Why let this happen?

>>64383875 (OP)
What the fuck would one (or a 100) of these things even do? Waddle around like it just shit itself for 20 minutes then run out of battery and ask politely to be plugged into a socket?

>>64383932
Add a boy butt and it could reduce conscript rape by 40%.

>>64383932
In 2015, you would be saying the same of FPV drones.

>>64383883
They're paid 1700 dollars, plus training, equipement and food, and a dead man is a net loss for the economy. Its way more profitable to make him work for the military industry than send him waste money and equipment.

>those chinese robots have no military use yet.
They can, just equip them with ready-for-launch gear (backpack similar to pic related) and let it run into the zone to drop landmines/drones/recon equipments.

>>64383932
It should be used as an alternative for drones with more weight and battery capacity, to get to point A-point B with a gear and come back, it should have enough power to do so, especially if its dropped and picked up by a car at a given zone.

>>64383875 (OP)
>he thinks monke is interested in paying pensions
KEKW

Because it cant do shit.

You're an idiot whos been fooled by a bunch of motors moving in a preprogrammed sequence

>>64383952
Perhaps. Can you answer the question though? You could answer it for FPV drones. For example
>they're cheap, easy to get, and can easily be equipped with enough boom to kill infantry/lightly armored vehicles/terror bomb civilians

>>64383961
>It should be used as an alternative for drones
It's a million times slower and actually has to deal with the terrain, unlike drones. Even with a bigger battery, it's not going to be able to traverse anywhere near the same distance before it runs out. And a big part of what makes drones worth it in the first place is that they're cheap. A bipedal robot will always be many times more expensive than a shitty ass alibaba drone. And for what? What do you get for the added complexity and cost? If you really want something on the ground, just use a UGV, they exist already, they've seen some use, and they're not a retarded gimmick.

>>64384010
The robots are made (at least they seem to be made) to overcome any obstacle or accidental fall and keep up in their trajectory, something a UGV cant do.
As for drones, these robots can carry a lot of them silently until they can be dropped close enough for a full surprise effect, similar to the ukrainian operation spiderweb, except they can be dropped from a no man's land. The battery is the main issue but the robot path can be shortened by dropping and picking him into a given zone by a vehicle, and the researches for safe miniaturized nuclear batteries are already in progress.

>>64384087
many citations needed

>>64384087
>The robots are made (at least they seem to be made) to overcome any obstacle or accidental fall and keep up in their trajectory, something a UGV cant do.
Anon, stop being retarded for a sec. Do you really think that these little pieces of shit are going to have an easier time in rough terrain than a UGV?
>As for drones, these robots can carry a lot of them
Like, maybe 2 drones at a time, if they're small. It's 1.3m and 35kg, it can't carry shit. It's slower, more conspicuous and less reliable than just having some dude carry a gym bag. I'd unironically trust the doordash delivery robot more.

>>64383875 (OP)
It runs out of battery and there's nowhere to plug it in in the middle of a muddy field.

>>64384143
Yeah a UGV is probably more convenient for these kind of missions, but they can make a difference in urban areas, where ruins are difficult obstacles for wheels.

>>64383875 (OP)
Putler is light years ahead of you OP

>>64384175
I will never understand why they thought it would be easier to build a robot to drive an ATV rather than just sticking the motors and solenoids and whatnot directly on the ATV’s controls.

Unless there was no robot and it’s actually secretly a midget twink or something

>>64383875 (OP)
>paying life pension to a disabled soldier or their families
you're under this weird illusion (or delusion) that they do this. the money is 'paid' alright, just not to the soldiers' family, but to somebody else.

>>64383875 (OP)
>less expensive than paying life pension to a disabled soldier or their families.
LOL, if you're Russian and you get your leg blown off they'll tell you that you did it on purpose and send you back yo the front with a crutch.
Nobody's inning any pension in Russia.

>>64384187
These are the same people who would develop humanoid robots to shelve groceries at supermarket, instead of just turning the supermarket into an automated vending machine. This is what lack of creativity does to a motherfucker.

>>64383875 (OP)
Why the hell are they designed with that cheap fucking plastic? I looks like something out of the 90s, and not in a good way.

>>64384294
I love these

>>64384294
>>64384324
Control software be like:
>Ring ding ding daa baa. Baa aramba baa bom baa barooumba.
>Wh-wha-what's going on-on?

>>64383875 (OP)
Get back to me when one of these can scale Mt everest

>>64384352
>Get back to me when one of these can scale Mt everest

>>64384294
They can implant the entire Tekken 3 Eddie Gordo move list into them?

>>64384324
> check my moves
> that chick diggin it
> oh yeah
> gonna get my charging harness tugged tonight
***trips***
> ahh fuck shit fuck
> i ruined it
> i fucking ruined it
> get up get up get up get up get up
> i ruined it get up get up
> fuck get up get up
> its over

>>64384187
It was just money embezzling scheme.

>>64383875 (OP)
Name one (1) combat-related task that thing is capable of performing. Follow-up question: how do you expect it to get past even the simplest of obstacles?

>>64384087
>The robots are made (at least they seem to be made) to overcome any obstacle
I stopped reading

Make it 7 feat tall, air droppable, Add in an autocannon and two shields and it has some uses.

>>64383961
Have you ever actually seen one of these things try to move?
This isn't Boston dynamics we are talking about here, chinkbots would be worse than useless on a battlefield

>>64383875 (OP)
You know, before I deep dive into my secret anon archives for the esoteric chain of events that lead to how and why Russia will never ever feild space age terminators but I would first ask had you considered why they don't produce soldiers, but mobiks? Or why those poor faggots don't have socks? Or food?
Do you think there would sort of be a building strata of events and results that leads to air-droppable terminators, and that you cannot fill in those steps with things Russia has done?

>>64383909
Why does "policy institute" always coincide with a "nest of communist snakes"?

>>64383875 (OP)
Call me when they look like pic related.

>>64383875 (OP)
Those things are the perfect size rn.
Im eagerly awaiting the creation of my realistically detailed Loli murderbot.

>>64383909
I'm entering the last year of my PhD on IA applied to robotics control and I can tell you the US is far above China in every aspect of robotics except maybe the ability of pumping a trillion robots a year for cheap using money given by the commies. All the Chinese robots you see here are using algorithms developed in the US by Schulman trained on simulators made in the US by Nvidia on hardware made in Taiwan by TSMC and designed in the US by NVIDIA. The research landscape is basically this :
>US/EU Guy working in the US make a breakthrough
>Chinks improve on it by scraping 1% perfs and pumping out one billion papers
>Indians implement the said improvements and try to convince HR they are smart
It's that simple, everyone disagreeing never published anything worth reading
>t. I'm not even a US citizen

>>64384307
They can run through glass doors without problems. They're way more durable than they look.

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/q_lalPtKlcU

>>64385985
Yeah thats cool and all, but this doesnt answer the real burning question.

When will we be able to fuck the robots?

>>64386039
Honestly not in the next 10 years. I know 0 serious labs working on that + kys looser

>>64385577
https://youtu.be/p0HSq49xgyQ?t=53

>>64383883
>also those chinese robots have no military use yet.
...and the Russians?

>>64386039
What's stopping you, you dumb fucking retard?

>>64383875 (OP)
ground clankers are for occupation units. airborne drones are for war.

>>64385560
>You're a commie of you point out America's decline
Is trump a commie?
inb4 "yes"