>>64402640
>Too bad that it doesn’t support your conclusions at all
How so? Be detailed, please. We know for a fact that Patriot SAM systems are capable of detecting, tracking, and engaging Kh-101 CMs that have a smaller frontal and mean RCS than an SU-57. We also know that the build quality of the SU-57 is utter shit, with panel gaps being non-uniform and misaligned panel height between transition from one panel to another, that will most definitely increase its RCS. We also know that the SU-57 lacks any type of serrated edges, or magnetic tape to dissipate the EM energy from traveling and creeping waves, which will increase its RCS. We know that the SU-57 doesn't use any type of advanced composite materials for skin panels that could act as Radar Absorbing Structures (RAS) (Like the F-35's carbon composite panels and the Carbon Nanotube (CNT) layer on top of the composite skin panels that function as the F-35s RAM), and we also know the SU-57 lacks the use of any type of Radar Absorbing Material (RAM), or any type of conductive coating (like the F-22's polymer based coating with silver particles in it), this, too, will dramatically increase its RCS. Finally, we know that the SU-57 doesn't use any type of edge treatments on its leading and trailing edges to further reduce its RCS. So, if anything, that simulation is optimistic, and is literally a best-case-scenario of a perfectly built SU-57 with exceptional build quality. When we have verifiable evidence that isn't the case, and the build quality of the SU-57 is utter dogshit.
