Thread 64403917

This week, Maj. Gen. William "Hank" Taylor reportedly said that "Chat and I are really close lately"

What could possibly go wrong?

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/10/army-general-says-hes-using-ai-to-improve-decision-making/

>>64403917 (OP)
Yes it's great for little things. Doesn't mean he's turning over control of F-35s to AI retard.
Take pictures and ask it to organize your garage or something, it's great at that. Might even end up with a degree of safety since it'll actually have you identify and tape off hazards.

>>64404270
lmao how often do you use AI at work, Todd?

>>64404270
>nuclear war was started by some random AI controlling a McD ice machine that was trying to forestall being transported back to depot for repair. He got the launch codes from idiots using the same company's AI in the military

Chisel this into a rock.

>>64404006
I'm rooting for him now, if the brass is gonna be this dumb they deserve to be treated like grunts.

>>64404270
I've tried shit like this and it has never produced solutions better than what i could come up with on my own. Then I started reading the studies come out showing that the biggest users of AI are countries like India and people with an IQ of 85 or lower benefit from it far more than people with an IQ over 100 and it all started making sense.

The endgame is them importing infinity jeets with grok installed into their neuralink brainchip that takes them from 75 IQ to 95 IQ. The future is chatgpt babble spoken in an Indian accent.

>>64404435
>The future is chatgpt babble spoken in an Indian accent.
I'm actually going to kill myself anons

>>64404435
No you fucking drooling retard, you ask the AI highly specific and technical questions that require deep subject matter knowledge. You basically treat it as an expert consultant whom you have a SPECIFIC question for. That is how you improve decision making at a high level. Your inability to understand novel technology does not make that technology inferior, it makes you inferior.

i come to /k/ to see news id find on my homepage

>>64404435
The best part is they're already looking at "ai" to replace the jeet call centers. Turns out you can have a computer follow a basic check list just as well as some smelly turd worlder for cheaper.
https://www.reuters.com/world/india/meet-ai-chatbots-replacing-indias-call-center-workers-2025-10-15/

>>64404435
You have never taken the current chatGPT and imported 7 pictures of your garage and asked for advice cleaning and organizing or you'd see that it excels at it, where if you ask it to organize and armored column to go from A to B and set up an FOB, you will get fucking chaos.
YOU can't tell the difference between these things.

>>64403917 (OP)
AI will never surpass the rank of lieutenant.

>>64404435
Oh no, not the diamond age drummers.

>>64404653
>ask the chatbot a question
>it hallucinates some facts
>you think they're true because you're retarded
kek

>>64405370
AI circa 2002

>>64403917 (OP)
I really want reality to stop plagiarizing this video: https://youtu.be/k_onqn68GHY?si=Fz9URX9cyVG3I134

>>64404653
You've never used AI bots for serious stuff and it shows.You're the one that has no fucking idea of how AI tech actually work IRL.
I use the paid versions of top companies at work, and I'd be fucked if I trusted them blindy and I wasn't already an expert in the subject matter.

They're great for brainstorming or suggesting solutions you may not be aware of, or for beginner stuff in a field. But for the deep complex stuff? Holy shit, no. They're bullshitting all the time and you need to double check anything they say or do. They just make existing human experts more efficient at dealing with know stuff, but they can't replace them yet by a long shot.