← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 64412040

19 posts 24 images /k/
Anonymous No.64412040 [Report] >>64412056 >>64412073 >>64415503 >>64415567 >>64416496
We have >1.2 TWR jets, fly by wire, and thrust vectoring now. Bring back tailsitters.
Anonymous No.64412056 [Report] >>64412070
>>64412040 (OP)
They are only good for interceptors because you don't care about carrying a heap of bombs, we don't make interceptors anymore because SAMs do the same job better and cheaper.
Anonymous No.64412070 [Report] >>64412077
>>64412056
what if the interceptor can plink 20+ drones in one go
Anonymous No.64412073 [Report] >>64413052
>>64412040 (OP)
Sikorsky is trying to, with a drone at least. Which honestly probably the best way to do it. No fucking way would I trust myself to back a plane into the ground
Anonymous No.64412077 [Report]
>>64412070
For counter drone can can make a small cheap tail sitter drone if you really want.
Anonymous No.64413047 [Report]
Okay, but they'll be bigger than they used to be.
Anonymous No.64413052 [Report]
>>64412073
VBAT has been very successful as well.
Anonymous No.64413068 [Report]
Anonymous No.64413097 [Report]
Anonymous No.64413190 [Report]
Anonymous No.64413378 [Report] >>64416489
>tailsitters

More like, sitting on your ASS LMAO. This is a zero-length launch board, get outta 'ere.
Anonymous No.64413381 [Report] >>64416489
Anonymous No.64413387 [Report] >>64416489
Anonymous No.64413399 [Report] >>64416489
Anonymous No.64413480 [Report]
Anonymous No.64415503 [Report]
>>64412040 (OP)
They're already back, in drone form.
Anonymous No.64415567 [Report]
>>64412040 (OP)
1.2 TWR with 50% fuel, no drop tanks and light loadout*
Anonymous No.64416489 [Report]
>>64413378
>>64413381
>>64413387
>>64413399
Zero Length Launch was an impressive technology demonstrator, a few decades ago - but the future is CATOBAR carriers floating above cloud level. Get with the times old man.
Anonymous No.64416496 [Report]
>>64412040 (OP)
Didn't Ukraine already field some kind of tailsitter defense drones?