>>64425455
Forcing the state to spend billions to reequip the entirety of its law enforcement agencies will, in fact, send a rather strong message. The cost of redesigning your entire product line, the loss of overall market share, the public backlash, and the odds of other states deciding to keep going after you? Naw, that's all trivial by comparison right? And other states deciding to sue you out of existence unless you cut off your civilian sales as well, that won't have any effects on the bottom line? Glock is going to obliterate its own market share in the US and not even try to fight back. And while I know Nig-I mean Sig would be happy to lick Newsom's asshole, I don't think CA would be happy with guns that go off on their own.
And even then people will continue sell gen 3 clones everywhere and consumers will keep buying "not a glock brand glock". I could be completely wrong about this, Glock may have been looking for an opportunity to do just this so they can retool and get full patent coverage again and this provides the perfect excuse to cancel everything and do just that. They already canceled half their product lines earlier this year.