Thread 64447952

gun ideas

>>64447952 (OP)
>>64447959
Not to shoot you down but this would have the same muzzle velocity as 7.5 FK and similar energy at the muzzle

>>64448079
>it's a handgrenade but with a twist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5yjrr7OzYk

>>64448079
bullet know where to go

>>64447952 (OP)
alright I'll bite

>>64448117
this but in 357 sig

>>64447952 (OP)
A more complicated british flavored mataeba

>>64448178
And give it the Von Steiger ejector so all you have to do is put new rounds in when empty.

A more complicated and stupid desert eagle

>>64448117
Flip detected.

>>64448079
It's actually this one
https://youtu.be/zbKoDcsPGIk

>>64448200
The only thing I share with any flip is a name, no blood.

shoulder fired mortar

>>64448263
I have a better explosive delivery system in mind.

Basically a suppressed 45-70 semiautomatic shooting the heaviest 45-70 you can get. Pic related would be like a vintorez except the projectile would have 3x the energy.

>>64448263
This is awesome

>>64448131
Sights? What for in this case? You'd hip fire it at point blank.

>>64448393
>You'd hip fire it at point blank.
Says who? There's no unspoken rule that says you have to wait until somebody's close enough to kick your ass to draw on them.

>>64448263
>>64448346
Somewhat ommon sight in Ukraine nowadays
Drones make better use of ordinary cummulative shells and mortar hefrag works better ahainst anything else

>>64447959
so kinda like

>>64447952 (OP)
Kinda seeing where you're going with it.

>>64447984
If chambered for .300BLK like the original concept for that magazine, most likely. Though it would probably be a very fun and loud blaster. Potentially though, something like this could be used to make somewhat slimmer grips for long Magnum cartridges such as .45 WinMag and .50 Action Express, and then also optimizing a bit for barrel length.

I think OP's idea might have some merit.

>>64448079
Is that an older pic, or are you building a second one of those pistols?

>>64447984
It would be around 5-10% more powerful than 7.5 with a 6" barrel and that gap would increase with barrel length. The biggest problem would be dealing with the bullets unseating, that's a lot of distance to cover in a short amount of time. Maybe some kind of clockwork could be added to limit the cycling speed.

>>64448656
Yes, except with an actual chamber because I know how guns work.

>>64447959
damn

>>64448131
Bond Arms makes a bunch of .410 derringers.

>>64449157
>clockwork
Fuck off with your mountain German space magic.

>>64448479
Aiming? With a .410 derringer?

>>64449219
Maybe there's another way to do it, but what we need here is to apply an unchanged amount of power over an increased period of time, and an escape wheel is the mechanical linkage that's designed to do just that.

I want a .25 ACP bullet hose for conceal carry

>>64449171
Their downside is they weigh as much as a compact 9

A beretta 90 series with a plastic frame and a steel frame with the option of adding tungsten inserts. The cyclic mass of the slide is reduced as much as possible to decrease the effect of the slide on muzzle rise. I would also move the decocker back to the frame. The gun would be DA/SA decocker only or SA manual safety.
Holes would be dripped in the frame for an optic rail above the slide.
Basically a CZ-75 beretta 90 series. options would also include porting, threading, and frame mounted compensators

>>64448079
Would be diamond video content REDDITOR (you)

>>64449700

What's this?

>>64449918
An early attempt at making an ultra-reliable and ultra-cheap full-auto-only open bolt firing assault rifle for the South Vietnamese army.
Got killed off early in testing when the prototypes proved less reliable than than M16s, and the South Vietnamese army was already pretty much defeated.

>>64449171
Yeah and they look FUCKING UGLY.

>>64449918
>>64449924
Forgot to mention it, but it was called the TRW Low Maintenance Rifle.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRW_Low_Maintenance_Rifle

>>64448201
>why does he need a helmet?
>oh fuck, that's why

Over 9000 hours to hand draw a rough sketch of an idea I had for a folding chassis that telescopes the barreled action for a further decrease to OAL when folded

>>64449959
Failed to upload the first time

>>64449959
Make it

>>64449987
I might make a mockup proof of concept kind of thing. I'm curious to see how much you can actually telescope the barreled action reasonably and if it will make much of a difference at all compared to just a regular folding stock

>>64449945
Life imitates art

>>64452528
Iran beat you to it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KH-2002

>>64452528
gross

>>64452710
that thing looks like shit. it's also piston operated

>>64453045
so where does the bolt/buffer tube go on
>>64452528
if it's a DI in a vaguely AR pattern

>>64447952 (OP)
RSh-12 in .50 Beowulf. Can be accompanied by ShAK-12 version too.

>>64453156
it doesn't have a buffer tube. bufferless DI guns exist, there's nothing about a DI gas system that necessitates a buffer tube. picrel, cmmg dissent DI carrier.
if you really want to, you could make the carrier larger in diameter so it has the same mass as a normal AR carrier.

>>64453219
is there a meaningful difference between 50 beo and the 12.7 cartridge it already uses?
also why not use 500 magnum instead? the rebated rim of .50 beo would make the cylinder janky.
also it performs basically the same as 500 magnum

>muzzle loaded
>integral suppressor
>6 o' clock barrel
>quick swap cylinder
fun fact: suppressors on muzzle loaders are not regulated by the NFA,
because muzzle loaders themselves are not considered firearms
(silencerco maxim 50 for example)
therefore, you could theoretically ship a suppressed muzzle loaded revolver directly to your door, totally unregulated.
with a quick swap cylinder, it would reload faster than a normal revolver.
probably as fast as a normal mag fed pistol.

>>64453664
>is there a meaningful difference between 50 beo and the 12.7 cartridge it already uses?
About 13mm in length
>why not use 500 magnum instead?
Why not, either way works for me, as long it's not some russian unobtanium.
I just want a lower cylinder fired .50

>>64454294
12.7 is .50 in metric. not sure what you meant by "about 13mm", they're the same diameter.

>>64454313
In length, genius. .50 Beowulf is 12,7x42mm, STs-130 is 12.7×55mm

>>64454294
>I just want a lower cylinder fired .50
No thanks, I'll keep my digits.

>>64454342
chiappas explode because they're shitty.
ur gonna lose a digit no matter what if a pistol goes boom.

Made this ages ago

>>64454916
no stock? two gas pedals? why?

>>64447952 (OP)
i like ar pistols but they're way too big so behold my creation

>>64455167
fml forgot the attachment

>>64455176
that isn't a new idea at all

>>64455223
its so bulky though, i was thinking of something more compact

>>64455096
YOU HAVE TWO THUMBS, DONTCHA?

>>64455328
yeah and they're attached to my hands. no way you could reach that pedal with your shooting thumb

>>64454226
It would need to have a mechanism similar to a Nagant to create a gas seal.

>>64455693
thats just a little cam on the trigger that pushes the spring loaded cylinder forwards. 0 extra parts required,
the cylinder would already have to be spring loaded so that it can eject when reloading, like a double barrel shotgun.

>>64447952 (OP)
of all guns that should have been a bullpup, the calico is not one of them.

>>64455885
the mag goes on the bottom

>>64455096
Pretty sure I placed the closer pedal so that the pic didn't overlap the slide instead of for practicality
Stocks r gay

gordon if he real

I have three ideas, will have to get back home from work to post them. Please don't 404

>>64456360
is this meant to be mag fed from the top?
why does the oprod go into that magwell shaped thing? that doesn't make any sense.
also i'm pretty sure you scaled the picrail incorrectly, it looks way too big.
i also don't see an ejection port anywhere.
that box on the left is for a belt, right?
how does it feed? there are no feed palls.
i notice you have a foregrip angled to the right, so presumeably this is meant for a left-handed shooter.
however, it is impossible to get a cheekweld as a lefty because of that giant protrusion on the right side of the stock.
it also looks like you didn't model the bolt at all, the inside of the receiver is just a void.
based on the charging handle position, the bolt would have to be fully forward and locked for that to make sense.

just a lot of weird shit going on

slamfire door pavise

>>64457220
destiny scout rifle

>>64454916
>backwards optic

>>64458520
RIP

>>64458733
>>64458740
Based Hussites.
Ktož jsú boží bojovníci

>>64458520
>>64460921
Thank you for your patience, very little time to myself these days
First up:
6 o'clock position, break action, .44 magnum, rated for buffalo bore. Optional muzzle device for controlability and reduced force on the main pin

>>64462286
Second idea:
Pan-magazine fed, 12 guage shotgun-machine gun for anti-drone/personnel purposes. Would ideally be able to take either 3.5" magnum duck loads or just 2 and 2/3rds high brass loads
Please let me know what you think. I have some other ideas, but it'll be a minute before I can mspaint those up

>>64462295
>>64462286
Fucking ugly

>>64448178
>>64453219
>>64462286
What is with you bozos.
Just look at >>64454342 and get the fuck out of here

>>64462596
Fuck you
6 o'clock revolvers would be perfect for crimson trace

>>64462286
destiny hand cannon

>>64458699
Its an unfinished model but its finished enough to use as a reference for drawing
Its mag fed and belt fed
The operating system is offset thats why it goes into the mag
the picrail is scaled right its just 5.56 with a 10" barrel
the ejection port is at the bottom right in front of the trigger guard
the foregrip is for the quick change barrel mechanism
The bolt isnt modeled yes

>>64463139
Cool! What program did you use?

>>64463184
Autodesk fusion

>>64463430
Thank you!

>>64463133
>>64459133
Double checked
Praise Kek
Destinyfags called out

bump