Thread 64488022

>At such critical encounter, US satellites in the area were all jammed and US fighters lost coordination and communication momentarily.
wtf is this a real technology that China has?

>>64488022 (OP)
Implessive

>>64488023
>t. non-American nogunz
Discuss the topic, shitbird.

>>64488022 (OP)
>Nonsense social media spamming

>>64488026
How is it nonsense? Did this not happen?

>>64488025
>Y-you're hurting the feelings of the Chinese p-people
Implessive

>>64488022 (OP)
Grumble Panda is the only source I trust.

I guess China themselves are denying it

>>64488034
see
>>64488036
Do you trust them more or less than the Chinese government (which is contradicting this post)?

>>64488022 (OP)
With this most recent achievement, fate has in a single stroke, marked the decline of the west and spelled a new era of wondrous prosperity and peaceful global dominance for the Chinese dragon, which promises to firmly stand in sharp contrast to the historically bloody ascent of western powers and the cruel subjugation it brought to the humbler nations of the world. With the blessings of Chinese quantum direct-current electricity, quantum aircraft carriers and quantum enhanced railguns will be the instruments with which China affirms its noble stewardship of 21st century world politics and offers the non-western world a different option; an humanist alternative to the depredations of Western leadership and the opportunity for a more equitable and dignified multilateralism.

>>64488042
>words words words
didn't read

>>64488039
I trust them as much as I trust every government, not at all.

Let me guess: Another refinery?

>>64488025
There is no topic to be discussed when everything in this post is false.

>>64488049
Okay, so do you think the Chinese have the technology to jam our aircraft from space?

>>64488055
>our
Lol, you're brown.

>>64488055
Trusting no one doesn't mean believing anyone.

>>64488053
That's literally the topic lmao
>wtf is this a real technology that China has?
learn to read, kiddo

>>64488058
It's a yes or no question, little buddy.

>>64488061
>if you don't believe the Chinese government that means you trust Grumble Panda
Read a book anon, you need it.

>>64488062
Personally, I don't know if China has the ability to jam our aircraft using satellites. Two untrustworthy sources are saying opposite things about the topic, and I am asking you what you think the answer is.

>>64488065
For me extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, without any proof of the jamming I am unlikely to believe it but I also don't expect the US military or government to publically report their failures.
I would consider it unlikely but possible.

>>64488022 (OP)
Aurora Borealis?

>>64488072
I think the evidence being offered is those crashes in the South China Sea, but those could just be due to regular military incompetence.

>>64488028
>Prove it wasn't just real in my mind!

>>64488077
Jamming wouldn't cause crashes of manned aircraft so if that is the claim I'm calling bullshit.

>>64488081
see
>>64488065

>>64488084
If you're neutral why are you caring about unverified rumors?

>>64488083
Okay, so the Chinese government are telling the truth? Good to know.

>>64488086
>answering a question with a question
The epitome of tactless autistic rudeness

>>64488051
You were wrong. Apparently it was huge weapon/drone/fuel catche in dumbass this time

>>64488090
Im rude to people who think they're being smart with this lack of effort in being subtle. You're hyping up retarded claims no one buys for a reason.

>>64488092
You can just say you don't know, champ. It's okay.

>>64488087
Not trusting someone doesn't mean they lie about everything anon.

>>64488095
Isn't that what you should be saying?

Chang really is getting mad that no one believes in Chink space magic

>>64488097
I already did.
>Personally, I don't know if China has the ability to jam our aircraft using satellites
literally me 15 minutes ago lol

>>64488102
Yet you keep entertaining it, curious.

>>64488105
I'm just asking questions. If you don't know the answers, you're free to go troll and baitpost in another thread, baby boy.

>>64488108
Are you mad no one else wants to entertain an idea that gets destroyed in a simple search?

>>64488022 (OP)
>wtf is this a real technology that China has?

>>64488113
And what's your source? The Chinese government? lol

>>64488121
Why are you this mad that no one buys your bullshit?

holy fuck the retard is mad no one is engaging his bad faith posting

>>64488127
>>64488128

>>64488128
His supervisor told him we wouldn't get his gutter oil if he didn't post more slide threads

>>64488135
You're just calming venting your frustrations that no one buys this, gotcha.