Thread 64493149

This site has gone full, turbo-gay.
>weapons your favorite anime faggot would use, if all anime characters weren't complete pussies
>Warhammer 40k weapons, keep that fucking shit in /tg/
>ALL UKRAINE, EVERY FUCKING HOUR OF EVERYBFUCKING DAY FOR THE LAST 3 GOD-DAMNED YEAR
>more fucking WH40k threads
>Any Rifle General-the faggoty tourist rendezvous thread
>no less than 3 "CHINK RAND SO GLEAT. BEST COUNTLY EVVA." self-sucking threads for esl chinks and ironically poos.
>How to make a perfect weapon "perfecter", the ultimate guide for psuedo-intellectual goober to discuss points of minutae nobody gives a fuck about
>cAn AnTimAtTer be wEaPonIzed???!?!?!-Circle jerk thread for fake-ass smarty pants v.2

You made this place into a reddit safe-space, you fucking ignorant bitches. You all deserve this place now.

This a weapons thread, for you faggot jannies.

anime website

>>ALL UKRAINE, EVERY FUCKING HOUR OF EVERYBFUCKING DAY
>There's only 3 threads right now that are remotely ukraine related
What did OP mean by this?

>>64493162
Most of them get deleted. If they didn't, the entire catalog would be full of them.

>>64493157
You and everyone else who likes tranime are fucking gayer than 5 dudes blowing 6 dudes.

>>64493149 (OP)
No, it's always been like this. You just haven't been here long enough.

>>64493162
it means that OP is a whiny cumchugging vatnik and is butthurt that his vatnik threads keep getting jannied

>>64493171
At least we used to have Waco / ATF threads.

>>64493168
Why are you this insecure? Are you a closet homo or something?
This is an incredible level of posturing and signaling. Nobody does this shit unless they're actually gay and the closet themselves.

>>64493168
>Hasn't seen /y/ yet.

>>64493149 (OP)
>This site has gone full, turbo-gay.
We wanted you to feel at home.

>>64493171
That's just not true. Years back, there were a handful of decent threads starting each day. Now we're stuck with a handful of decent threads each week, with the rest of them being shit.
/k/ was shit before the war sure, but the war's only made it way worse.

aw sweet, a meltie!

>>64493175
We had to stop because everybody agreed they were turning /k/ into /pol/. If you wanted /pol/ you can just go to /pol/ but even /pol/ hates /pol/

>>64493188
>everybody agreed
What's up with reddit war tourists and this fake consensus shit? It's so fucking lame and transparent lol
>/tv/ is not one person
>/k/ is not one person
>4chan is not one person
no matter how much you want it to be so

>>64493182
Nah, your tastes just changed as you realized the "good" threads were actually shit.

>>64493188
>If you wanted /pol/ you can just go to /pol/ but even /pol/ hates /pol/
For good reason. /pol/ isn't even /pol/ anymore. None of the happeningfags and reasonable individuals who posted there back in the earlier 2010s are there anymore. It's just bots and shills and spam threads all the way down.
It's a dead board.

>>64493197
But that doesn't even make any sense.
I still like the good threads on /k/. They're just way more rare than they used to be.

>>64493202
Every few months I'll make an Operation Gladio / Strategy of Tension thread, which as far as I can tell are the only good content on that God-forsaken board.

>>64493149 (OP)
>please please please do not discuss the largest war in yurop since ww2 on a WEAPONS board

>>64493231
War is an extension of politics.
It's not inherent to the weapons board, unless you discuss it from the perspective of weapons and general militaria.

>>64493238
Wars are fought with WEAPONS. WEAPONS are used by soldiers. Soldiers are commanded by their superiors with tactics and strategies involved. It is all WEAPONS-related, and you're just a coping faggot.

>>64493238
>War is an extension of politics.
No, war and politics are both extensions of economics.

>>64493250
>It is all WEAPONS-related
This is a nonsense argument since you can extend this line of thinking to almost anything.
>Weapons are used by people and people are involved in sex, so it's okay to post NSFW material on /k/

>>64493261
Your perception and conceptualization of the subjects at hand is entirely arbitrary.

>>64493149 (OP)
May I see your quality threads?

>>64493266
No, not really. Politics is ultimately about resource / land allocation, and so is war. It's all economics.

>>64493272
And economics is all about animals wanting to prioritize their survival and genes being passed on, so it's actually all biology!
But biology is actually all chemistry!
And chemistry is actually all physics!
And physics is all actually mathematics and philosophy!
And philosophy and mathematics are actually all arbitrary unprovable systems, so it's all ultimately just belief.

>>64493287
>And economics is all about animals wanting to prioritize their survival and genes being passed on
Except this isn't true, because our current economic system is characterized by a pathological pursuit of resource acquisition at the expense of the rest of the species / planet. Economics are a particularly human phenomenon.

>>64493299
>Except this isn't true, because our current economic system is characterized by a pathological pursuit of resource acquisition at the expense of the rest of the species / planet
You literally just reiterated my argument from a different perspective.
The rest of the species or planet do not matter one fucking bit if your own genes pass on.
That is the basis of evolutionary pressure. Genes that pass on propagate and dominate, are more competitive.

>Economics are a particularly human phenomenon.
Monkeys and apes have a basic understanding of trade and fairness. They participate in it whenever given the option.

>>64493315
Except humans are a social species, so the destruction of everyone else means the end of your line as well. Like I said, it's pathological. It's a mind disease.

>>64493167
Schizo spam doesn’t count

>>64493177
/y/ is for schizophrenic femcels and ftm troons these days

>>64493321
>Except humans are a social species, so the destruction of everyone else means the end of your line as well.
Except it doesn't.
Humans can and would survive easily even if everyone outside of your "family" died off. We are the single most competitive and capable species on this planet. Nothing else on this planet is as adaptive as we are.
> Like I said, it's pathological. It's a mind disease.
It's not. This is a misunderstanding brought on by your own human perspective and ego.
All human behavior is ultimately driven by the demands of competition, which in turn is a fundamental aspect of our universe.
If you are not competitive, you will not survive; you will not breed.
If you are competitive, you will survive and you will breed: your genes and behavior will continue and spread.
Through this basic rule, our universe itself has driven humans into this state of being. All human behavior, including what you said:
>our current economic system is characterized by a pathological pursuit of resource acquisition at the expense of the rest of the species / planet. Economics are a particularly human phenomenon.
is driven by the simple reality that this behavior was and is what is most competitive, what is actually and factually rewarded. This behavior is most likely to provide continued existence for the genes in any single human being, so it's how any successful individuals and groups behave.
There is no honest way to call it pathological, when it's quite simply the end-result of humans winning at biological competition. It's not pathological. It's what winning looks like in our universe.

>>64493395
>he really thinks you can keep a species going with no other lineages and no habitable environment
lmao, case in point for how delusional these people are

>>64493410
>he really thinks you can keep a species going
That's irrelevant. The only thing that matters is the continuation of genes. Even if everyone else dies, as long as your genes continue, that's competitive and fine. If anything, it's better, since you've wiped out 99% of your competition, and now you're the only remaining example of your genes.
>with no other lineages and no habitable environment
Humans are not wild animals without sapience. You're talking about humanity as if we were wild horses, or something with equally low cognitive capabilities.

>>64493420
>Humans are not wild animals without sapience. You're talking about humanity as if we were wild horses, or something with equally low cognitive capabilities.
No, you are. I'm the one acknowledging that humans are the only social species that tolerates anti-social behavior on a mass scale, because of our unique human characteristics.