>>40073849>i, with zero information on the topic, am the prime source you should be listening to for your life changing operationthe cuts are "large" because you're cleaving tissue to relocate it. its more like amputation than a simple laparoscopic surgery like you're describing, and for PPT they do actually do the peritoneal flap laparoscopically because yes, they are actually trying to minimise the incisions!
the hole is as big as possible (still only like 2-3 inches) to fit as much of the grafted skin in there as possible, and to make dilation to a regular vaginal volume easier. the objective is to eventually reach a vaginal capacity large enough to fit a regular male penis in there so yeah the hole has to be relatively large compared to there being literally nothing beforehand
>>40073902>prolapseif you stick to regular sized insertions like regular piv sex, no. besides im pretty sure an srs vagina is less prone to prolapse than a cis vagina because of how all the tissues are attached
>infectionsame as any other surgery, but just maintain hygiene like a normal human being and youll be fine
>>40073913the notion that srs pussy isnt cis passing is spread by people who have only seen pornstar pussy
most srs vaginas can't even be told apart by obgyns, the literal pussy doctors
if it only becomes distinguishable when you're told beforehand, is it really distinguishable?
that is to say of course that srs wont be guaranteed to produce you a pornstar pussy so you have to temper your own expectations as the patient too