Well?

>>40120899 (OP)
Because it is part of MAPLGBTQ

>>40120899 (OP)
>gee I wonder why the people being wrongly equated to child predators for merely existing in the public eye to reactionaries are worried about reactionaries enacting death penalty laws targeting those they deem as child predators?

>>40120899 (OP)
because the same people who want the death penalty for child rape also say that being trans in the presence of a child should constitute child rape
you know this

>>40120899 (OP)
Because people call us pedos for advocating for GAC for minors
Honestly, people call us pedos no matter what we do

>>40120933
Fucking THIS! It’s because cons and right wingers disingenuously employ the “think of the children” argument against lgbt issues. In my state of Arkansas, for example, there’s a de facto drag show ban (granted an unenforceable one), that classifies performances featuring gendered traits incongruent with the performer’s sex as adult-oriented.
Both conservatives and pedophiles (though I repeat myself) have been trying to align pedophilia with the lgbt community for decades, but it has been resoundingly repudiated the entire time.

>>40120899 (OP)
because you freaks call us pedophiles for existing in public

>>40121012
I just want you to not exist in public at all.
I don't really care what has to be done/said to make that happen.

>>40121021
is there a reason you feel this way?

because you made existing in public a sex crime and being seen by under 18 as a sex crime against kids, next shitty argument?

>>40121045
Why do you always say that as if you have no idea why people are annoyed with you? You are a fucking faggot larping as a woman. Die already.

>>40120899 (OP)
>law 1 classifies being trans is inherently obscene
>law 2 says obscene behavior in public is a sex offense against children
>law 3 establishes the death penalty for sex offenses against children
it's easy to see the pattern if you don't assume laws are always made and enforced in good faith.

>>40120949
>We need to sterilize children before age 12! It's incredibly important!
>Um, why?
>So they will be more fuckable! In the way that only young boys are. Also I hate myself and am going to kill myself.
You're right, I think you guys are stable people who are just unfairly misunderstood.

>>40121073
because i have trouble understanding why you'd have such a strong negative reaction. i dont want anyone to die, or even to suffer really. we're more alike than not

>>40120899 (OP)
why do conservatives project so hard?

>>40121102
>>law 1 classifies being trans is inherently obscene
Here's your fallacy btw, not what these proposed laws say.
Your second fallacy is that even if your first were true (it isn't), you have federal courts, and even the supreme court isn't going to go along with "trans existence is a death penalty offense". If you think they will, you're off the reservation, and no, upholding GAC bans isn't an indicator of "open season on trannies".

>>40121128
Because you are pretending to be something you are not, and want others to believe in your larp, and are ok with having them punished if they don't.

>>40121159
Ontologikally bad people

>>40121175
Anon, what do you think "drag bans" are?

>>40121107
>we need to keep girls fuckable and sexy and not mutilated by hormones or surgeries.... well except these totally medically needed breast implants or something

>>40121309
A roundabout way to to prevent gay kids from coming out.

>>40121178
strongest chaser ally

>>40121314
>men who identify as women
so...not trans women...?

>>40121314
>extrapolating data 20x times
>country in which its nearly impossible to jail a woman for a sexual offence and when legally a wombyn isnt able to rape someone so they have to be registered as male
>majority of "trans prisoners" refused to say they are or even "identify as" women and has openly selfIDd "crossdressers/transvestites" in the sample
>numbers unconfirmed by anything but look at le big amount of dots or somethinf
Anon...

>>40121351
Funniest thing, they actually refused to "ID as women" in the sample. The only reason they were let in is to shit on trannies rofl

>>40121351
>trans women
transwomen*
and transwomen are men who identify as women.

>>40121178
>you're pretending to be something you're not
not really im just being myself and asking society to linguistically put me in the box that doesn't make me feel like shit
>want others to believe in your larp
i mean ideally. i think there's a pretty fair scientific basis for at least gender dysphoria being real at this point so it's not a larp though.
>okay with having them punished if they don't
guilt by association. i dont do that. it would be equally fair for me to take this post and say all chasers are undateable

>>40121314
?48000 kompared to 30 million
Yeah this is TOOOTALLY reliable

>>40121357
wrong its entirely possible for a women to rape a man if she forces him to perform intercourse agenst his consent.

>>40121321
Breast implants are classified as medical devices for a good reason, they enhance fertility rates. Why are feminists so anti-life and anti-white?

>>40121357
NTA, it's all seasoning for the pot as far as normies are concerned. No rando on the street is going to care about the hairsplitting of "this person isn't actually trans, they identify as a crossdresser"

>>40121309
Bans of organized drag performances and lewd public display by people who identify as men and dress like women.
Key parts being organized performances and lewd displays.
And even if you hyperventilate this to 11 for yourself, again, the courts aren't going to dive down onto "yeah let's kill the trannies because trans-> public drag -> childhood sexual assault -> death penalty." It's histrionics to the Nth degree. By all means oppose this stuff but also calm down retard.

>>40120899 (OP) I would absolutely support the summary execution of child rapists, but I have a few problems with the laws suggested. Firstly the death penalty is used on people later proved innocent around 1/9 of the time, at least in the united states. This is a death toll I am uncomfortable with. Second, republicans want to deem transgenders child predators, and then support their execution, which is what people like DeSantis are trying to do. I don't want to get killed because my existence is deemed a sex crime. In my opinion though, if there is definite proof someone raped a child, they should be executed. I just think we should look at what the laws are actually doing.

>>40120899 (OP)
>xyz group are all child predators
>we should kill child predators
doesnt exactly take a great leap of logic to see what theyre really saying

>>40121393
Legally impossible according to british law anon
>>40121430
>lewd public display
Do you think "wearing female clothing as amab" is lewd public display? Thats what these laws said

>>40121454
The law is the will of females, written down. If females didn't want it to happen, it wouldn't be law.

>>40121454
>Do you think "wearing female clothing as amab" is lewd public display? Thats what these laws said
False:
> TN SB3, "A person who performs an adult cabaret performance on public property or in a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult commits an offense. 'Adult cabaret performance' means a performance in a location other than an adult-oriented establishment that features topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration."
>TX SB12, "A person who controls the premises of a commercial enterprise may not allow a sexually oriented performance to be presented on the premises in the presence of an individual younger than 18 years of age. A person may not present or allow the presentation of a sexually oriented performance on public property at any time. 'Sexually oriented performance' means a performance that features a performer who is nude or who engages in a sexual gesticulation using accessories or prosthetics that exaggerate male or female sexual characteristics or who engages in a performance that, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest."
>FL SB 1438, "A person who knowingly admits a minor to an adult live performance commits a misdemeanor of the first degree. 'Adult live performance' means any show, exhibition, or other presentation in a commercial establishment that is characterized by an emphasis on the depiction, description, or simulation of sexual conduct or the exposure of sexual organs, which, taken as a whole, is harmful to minors."

You may not like these restrictions and consider them a slippery slope, but to suggest "hey just existing on the street as a trans person in clothes matching your gender" meets the threshold NAIVELY is peak retardation and probably seeking victimhood.

>>40121506
Iranian women in 1980 would disagree

>>40120899 (OP)
because every "death penalty for sexual offenses against children" law is paired with a law that makes it a sex offense to be trans
>b-b-but that's based!
then don't complain when people other than you see through it, retard

>>40121511
when was the last time a female was arrested for being topless in public in the us?

>>40121382
it can be both trans women and transwomen and men who identify as women are still men it says so in the title

>>40121506
Most country's politics are male dominated.

>>40121568
Where the charge was unambiguously indecent exposure? Here you go
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/new-hampshire-laconia-topless-ordinance-upheld-free-the-nipple-heidi-lilley-kia-sinclair-ginger-pierro/
If it's mixed charges where lewd behavior or disorderly conduct or indecent exposure is one charge among many, like last week.
Irrelevant to the point anyway, btw,

>>40121588
that's not true, women just have no desire to be public figures, true power tries to hide itself in the shadows to remain unnoticed so fools like you will blame someone else

>>40121582
>transwomen and men who identify as women
A U B = A = B

>>40120899 (OP)
because most of the people who say this are chuds larping as trannies
also because its actually possible but probably wont happen anyway so i dont care much

>le animal with stretched neck says it twice
why is this shitty meme format always used for boomer-tier transphobic memes

>>40121606
>https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/new-hampshire-laconia-topless-ordinance-upheld-free-the-nipple-heidi-lilley-kia-sinclair-ginger-pierro/
Ok so one single time, and only during an organized protest where they probably told cops they were gonna do it, and they refused to shirt up when asked? My point is females largely get to do what they want. Men don't even have to be told, they hide their upper legs.

>>40121622
you know what I mean
just by the "study" naming them men who identify as women you know it's disingenuous at best and clearly false at worst

>>40121351
I hate every word you post

>>40121639
>Ok so one single time
No, retard, just one example provided because that's what you asked for. You're really bad at this.

>>40121661
Well, my point is simply that it's quite uncommon, not that it never happens. New Hampshire is a weird conservative shithole full of retiree boomers.

>>40121654
I don't know who you are

>>40121648
What's the difference between a man that identifies as a tranny and a tranny?

>>40121677
>New Hampshire
Ah yes, New Hampshire, the successful target of an organized Libertarian political migration movement, who support public nudity because restrictions bad, is a weird boomer conservative shithole.
>you: not that it never happens
>also you: Ok so one single time

>>40121511
>"Yeah, people always follow the exact letter of the law and interpret it in the best faith possible. Law is never twisted or used as a way to oppress people"
This is even more naive ,by orders of magnitude

>"male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration"
So like ...this klearly and easily allows for people to say that krossdressing is inkluded as something that is done exklusively for sexual reasons and/or is something that is inherently sexual
If being trans is then legislated or ruled to be illegitimate ,then all trans people out in publik not wearing the "clothing" of their assigned gender at birth is krossdressing ,and therefore in violation of this law
This really depends on other laws and the general outlook of the administration ,and bias and bigotry of the polise ,but just presenting it in isolation without konsidering all those other faktors (whic bode very poorly for your stated ,though likely not believed position) is very dishonest

>>40121712
libertarianism is soft sell fascism
once they get rid of the rules and the government, someone will seize power and nobody will have enough power to stop them
only fools think libertarianism is something distinct from extreme conservatism
ron paul - a legend of libertarianism was one of the most conservative members of congress
>who support public nudity because restrictions bad
wow who knew conservatives were actually hypocrites

>>40121724
>This is even more naive ,by orders of magnitude
Yeah, that's a fine argument, but it's distinct from what was actually being argued, which is
>the actual text of the law straight up prima facie bans trans people in public
>So like ...this klearly and easily allows for people to say that krossdressing is inkluded as something that is done exklusively for sexual reasons and/or is something that is inherently sexual
This is easily dismissable. "My existence on the road by going about my day is not designed to provide entertainment to anyone."
If you then wish to engage in a slope argument that every layer of the federal judiciary will agree that trans people merely existing on the street meets the threshold, *and also* that they meet the bar of child sexual abuse in doing so, I encourage you to place serious financial bets on that outcome so that if you're right you can flee the country. But I'd be on the other side of that outcome to take your money because I think that's an incredibly stupid position.

>>40121825
>"This is easily dismissable. "My existence on the road by going about my day is not designed to provide entertainment to anyone.""
If a group (the US administration) is intent on using the law to some ulterior motive rather than honestly following it ,this defense doesn't work
In modern Amerika the law is largely just used as pretext for aktion ,aktion whic they'll do with or without that pretext ,even if it blatantly violates the konstitution
Additionally ,if "crossdressing" is already determined (via Common Law or aktual inklusion in the text of the law) as inherently sexual ,then it doesn't really matter what you say
Your aktion is all that matters to them ,and they have determined that your aktion is inherently sexual and therefore violates the law in that regard

>"so that if you're right you can flee the country"
I'm not an Amerikan and I have no real self interest in the outkome of this

>>40120899 (OP)
because, like all transgenders, i love raping children. it feels so good to rape because i am transgender . i rape little babies, and also puppies and kittens

>>40121905
>If a group (the US administration) is intent on using the law to some ulterior motive rather than honestly following it ,this defense doesn't work
If that's true, then they don't even need these laws, because this argument applicable to basically any law already on the books.
I'll reiterate, if you actually believe this, put a sizeable-for-you financial stake on it. Betting markets exist for just that. You won't, because you don't believe it, or rather you don't believe it enough to stake anything valuable on it when pressed. It's just self-rewarding confirmation bias.
And damn, do trannies need to stop engaging in self-rewarding confirmation biases when evaluating the world around them.

>>40121970
>"If that's true, then they don't even need these laws, because this argument applicable to basically any law already on the books."
Like I said ,its pretext
As with all laws ,they are just pretext and justifikation for what komes after ,and are therefore sosial vehikles for the aims of the writers ,interpreters and exekutors ,whic in this kase kould (and is) very easily be anti trans polisies
The law itself does not imprison people ,it gives justifikation and support for people doing so
That is what I am saying this MAY be used to do (no telling if the buffonish US government will even try using suc takt ,or just go in and do it without muc real justifikation)

>"if you actually believe this, put a sizeable-for-you financial stake on it"
?People are even betting on whether the far right Amerikan government ,whic has openly stated its hostility to trans people and intention to roll bakk trans rights ,is gonna oppress trans people
That sounds like easy money lmao ,like gold and European arms kompany stokk when Trump blew up the Amerikan-dominated part of the then existing world order

>"And damn, do trannies need to stop engaging in self-rewarding confirmation biases when evaluating the world around them"
Thank you for klearly demonstrating how this is motivated reasoning rather than an honest diskussion

>>40122022
>Like I said ,its pretext
They have sufficient pretext already, namely indecent exposure laws. If they'll "use the law for some ulterior motive," that's true for those laws already written, they scale just as well.
>Thank you for klearly demonstrating how this is motivated reasoning
Yes, I'm motivated to get trannies to stop being histrionic retards because (shocker) I think it's bad for them in both the short and long term.
>That sounds like easy money lmao
Cool, post positions, or do it later considering you're a trip

>>40122049
I'm usually right about my politikal prediktions ,so politikal gambling sounds like an easy way to make money ngl
The benefits of understanding the underlying mekaniks that govern sosiety and sosial okkurrenses

>>40120899 (OP)
The death penalty for any case negatively affects everyone, because it is a barbaric, evil institution that harms the very moral fabric of society.

>>40121175
>here's your fallacy
The word you're looking for is 'premise.' You're saying that the premise of the argument is flawed, not that it's fallacious. You're either lying or retarded if you think there aren't conservative lawmakers attempting to make being trans in public 'obscene behavior,' and given that you're throwing around jargon that you clearly don't understand I think we all know you're just retarded.

>>40122323
I just want trans people outlawed. I genuinely do not care what the written justification is as long as they disappear from public life and public discourse.

>>40120933
have you tried not raping children
like literally raping children
with your penis

>>40121712
It’s far from perfect, a lot of so called libertarians are just lying and that shows when you look at the authoritarian laws in place there.
>>40121739
what a moronic post

>>40122323
>>here's your fallacy
>The word you're looking for is 'premise.' You're saying that the premise of the argument is flawed, not that it's fallacious.
Huh.
>etymology of "Fallacy"
>deception, false statement," from Latin fallacia "deception, deceit, trick, artifice," abstract noun from fallax (genitive fallacis) "deceptive," from fallere "deceive"
>Examples: "This statement is fallacious"
Maybe next time you try to well-akshually and self-fellate over language, you should aim for being accurate instead of just full of shit.
>You're either lying or retarded if you think blah blah blah
Read the thread and get in line, all of your retarded takes have been addressed already before you even scrounged them up.

>>40122332
all you can ever do is make us weirder and more miserable by trying to ban us

>>40122332
Thanks for the honesty, I'll be sure to have your death sentence commuted by our people's court when the revolution. comes.

>>40121175
>upholding GAC bans isn't an indicator of "open season on trannies"
banning trannies from living our lives is pretty much that actually, getting forcibly detrooned and being directly killed seem almost equally unpleasant

>>40122402
Just be an adult, retard. The GAC ban is a childhood GAC ban. You aren't getting forcibly detrooned.
Histrionics, once again.

>>40122373
>retarded failed debate bro busts out dictionary and still doesn't understand what a fallacy is
A fallacy is a mistake in reasoning. Fallacious statements are fallacious because the reasoning they contain may seem logical but is flawed. A false premise is a statement of fact that is not factually correct, leading someone to draw an erroneous conclusion. Please take your sub-room temperature IQ and go back to the farms, you are too stupid to post here (which is sad, because we have some real idiots on this board).

>>40122461
>busts out dictionary
>actually confusing etymology with a dictionary lookup
>A fallacy is a mistake in reasoning
It's also a wrong or deceitful statement, per both definitions and root analysis. But I'm not going to go back and forth with you in 30 posts over it because your compulsive autism demands it.

>>40122427
You said “GAC bans,” not “the specific trans-healthcare ban in Tennessee that applies to minors”
Both are evil and cruel, but one is obviously way worse since trans kids in TN who are too dumb to DIY/move can at least still get treatment as adults (for now) even if waiting will probably have permanently decreased their qol to some degree

>>40122427
Yeah, that's how it starts. But mark my words: selling cigarettes to adults is going to be banned any day now.

>>40122514
>if waiting will probably have permanently decreased their qol to some degree
because jazz jennings is the most envied trans person...oh wait.

>>40122514
>You said “GAC bans,” not “the specific trans-healthcare ban in Tennessee that applies to minors”
Yes, in the context of referencing the existing supreme court decision to predict future supreme court decisions.
>even the supreme court isn't going to go along with "trans existence is a death penalty offense". If you think they will, you're off the reservation, and no, upholding GAC bans isn't an indicator of "open season on trannies".

>>40122527
jazz jennings exists for the purpose of creating reality tv shows and is not representative of the average pediatric transitioner, she’s still better off as a botched youngshit than she would be as a botched late transitioning hon though
>>40122556
Okay yeah I misread your post then. I thought you meant that as if they were to uphold future blanket bans on trans healthcare it wouldn’t be the same thing as open season on trannies. I do think that recent case was an indication of their willingness to harm trans people though.

>>40122986
no one ever posts pediatric transitioners as examples to admire, rather everyone people looks up to and envies transitioned as an adult. "but jazz doesn't count!!11!" I'd buy that if real examples that did count could be provided but alas we only ever get counterfactuals.

>>40122986
>jazz jennings exists for the purpose of creating reality tv shows and is not representative of the average pediatric transitioner
Jazz's transition was planned and conducted by Marci Bowers, who is the head of WPATH, who writes the book on the policy and direction of the average pediatric transition.

>>40123064
i know id look worse if i didnt transition underage

>>40123064
>no one ever posts pediatric transitioners as examples to admire
but they literally do?
>>40123085
Bowers is a retard then

>>40123149
>but they literally do?
they literally don't. Not one would make it into the top 10 most popular posted here.

>>40123176
>”ever”
>”top 10 most popular”
that’s quite the leap, and I don’t think it’s even true either.

>>40121002
I understand that but it still doesnt look right. Like the reasonable reaction should be youre okay with it (as long as you also agree actual child predators deserve the death penality). There is a case to be made that it isnt right because its more about vegence than justice.

I would say it even opens you up to other meta attacks of having a guilty conscious.

I dont know how to tell you this, but there are plenty of "conservative" child predators. You should attack them and not defend an indefensible position.

>>40123236
transitioned as adults:
>contra, toob, schafer, finn, the matrix duo, levine,
transitioned as kids:
>????

holy goon

>>40123149
>Bowers is a retard then
I agree, the person responsible for describing and directing the worldwide standards of pediatric transition is retarded.

>>40120949
>people call us pedos for advocating for ACK for minors

>>40123349
you are literally the one advocating for ACK for minors

>>40123341
The situation has become too politically charged because of Christian Nationalist involvement in the public perception of gender nonconformity. The solution is to educate the public so that we have a better public understanding of gender. However, the Christian Nationalists have a vested interest in misleading the public to sow dissent for political gain. Therefore, we must attack Christian Nationalists to discredit them (not hard to do, but people get mad if you criticize Jebus). Defeat the Anti-American, Anti-Christian group that wears the skin of both for personal and political power.

>>40123315
>toob
>the matrix duo
>levine
lmao these people are absolutely not the most popular here, the only time they really even get posted is bait/hate threads
>schafer
didn’t she literally transition as a kid though?
>>40123341
Yes and I think that means we should have someone more intelligent, not no one.

>>40123447
>muh christians
most people dont care about that, only you are still so obsessed (totally not because of some fetish)

>>40123466
I intentionally tried to mix in people both famous/successful online and irl. I'm still missing examples disproving my point.

>>40123474
I honestly have no idea what you are trying to say. What people? What do they not care about? Am I obsessed? What am I obsessed about? Christians? I was talking about Christian Nationalists... Because of a fetish? What? A fetish for Christians? Am I trans all of a sudden? What the fuck is going on? Please clarify next time, but I have to sleep. Love you, gn.

>>40121073
look i get it if its a fucking hon. i saw fat beardy guys in dresses at the amusement park today and wanted to vomit. but not everyone is an ugly rapist. do you decide all men should die because some of you are midgets that molest kids? no, you dont. grow up. do some self reflection. be a human being. you might like it

>>40120899 (OP)
Twitter trannies are a bad representation of trannies as a whole. Though I know some trannies who are usually intelligent yet still somehow struck with delusional paranoia. They think they'll be falsely accused of child rape to justify mass executing trannies because they're all mentally ill and prone to irrational delusions + persecution complexes.

Oh also some of them rape kids. Hope that helps.

>>40121314
>>40121357
Their sources don't support the claims made. Years ago, BBC News also refuted the same claims from the group that image is from (FPFW):
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42221629
In short: the data excludes many trans inmates, who changed their legal sex. Because it excludes inmates who changed their legal sex, a disproportionate amount of the given cases probably fit the profile described in point 3 below.

Even taking it at face value:
1) England, where these stats are purported to be from, defines rape as a crime a female can't commit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_English_law#Female_perpetrators
2) Prostitution is a "sex offense"; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_sex_workers and https://freethoughtblogs.com/atg/2016/11/14/five-years-later-and-they-still-havent-read-that-fucking-swedish-study/
3) Men who aren't actually trans may identify as such after the fact of their sexual assault conviction to gain access to female inmates.
4) The "1,916 per million" number is extrapolated from 92 offenders out of a total population of 48,000 MTFs; even just a few cases of point 3 could immensely skew the statistic. It also hinges the fact of there being just 48K MTFs in the UK on dubious numbers drawn from a voluntary census question the ONS itself cast doubt on: https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/ons-wales-english-newham-england-b2443737.html

>>40123798
tl;dr he's saying that tranners manage to rape more kids despite being a super minority

meanwhole /pol/
>meanwhole /pol/
meanwhole /pol/
>meanwhole /pol/
meanwhole /pol/
>meanwhole /pol/

>>40123847
meanwhile* fml

>>40123847
meanwholes probably post on /pol/

>>40123847
A majority of people have the good sense to disavow something like this when challenged instead of saying "ackshually you're a chudphobe, plus it's not even that bad because trannies do it, plus stop making a big deal about it".
It's almost like anyone with two braincels to rub together knows not to fall for the psyop that you have defend bad actors in your community except for trannies.
It's almost like trannies are so fucking dumb they need to be put in camps, taught how to pass and then adopted out to men as legal property.

>>40123866
every time I post there I get banned because they get too triggered

>>40123447
>The situation has become too politically charged because of Christian Nationalist involvement in the public perception of gender nonconformity.
No, I'm pretty sure the situation has become politically charged because WPATH has been caught in lies to the public and the head of WPATH has publicly botched childhood transitions by following the standards WPATH lays out.

>>40123884
i'd think you'd get banned here too for spamming child porn but who knows

>>40120899 (OP)
The same way "crossdressing" is illegal. Change the letter of the law and prosecute whoever you want under whatever charge you make up

>>40123884
You should protest by posting a video of yourself riding a dildo

>>40123881
wait I recognize that dick

>>40123881
this image has so many references it's insane. kino actually pure kino

>>40123916
cope and seethe, pedo
>>40123929
you wish are you from /fa/?

>>40123961
how'd you know that i rape children? wtf

>>40123932
>>40123960
I can only take credit for adding the bulge
>>40123961
I'm from /pol/ now show me what that bussy do

>>40123991
hats off, transformative art

>>40123503
>I intentionally tried to mix in people both famous/successful online and irl
why? weren’t you trying to list people posted here that people here admire?
>I'm still missing examples disproving my point.
you literally included one in your own list

>>40122353
I don't?
like most all trannies , yet am equated to a predator by reactionary legislators & think tanks simply for existing.
tf are you on about ?

>>40124273
don't exist then

>>40124280
im good

>>40120933
>>40120947
>>40120949
Imagine telling on yourselves like this

>>40120933
>>40120947
>>40120949
This line of thinking is something you've been sold so that you make yourselves look bad. Just take a step back for a second and really think about it.
Trannies always do this, they play right into the hands of the people who want to use them as whipping boys.
How do you not get it? There are other things where I can see how you can be fooled but to be tricked into making yourselves look like pedophiles by defending pedophiles is deranged. Someone literally said "you have to do this or the chuds win" and you fell for it hook line and sinker.

>>40124306
>>40124389

>>40121351
I never seen a leftist punch a nazi