>>40121970
>"If that's true, then they don't even need these laws, because this argument applicable to basically any law already on the books."
Like I said ,its pretext
As with all laws ,they are just pretext and justifikation for what komes after ,and are therefore sosial vehikles for the aims of the writers ,interpreters and exekutors ,whic in this kase kould (and is) very easily be anti trans polisies
The law itself does not imprison people ,it gives justifikation and support for people doing so
That is what I am saying this MAY be used to do (no telling if the buffonish US government will even try using suc takt ,or just go in and do it without muc real justifikation)
>"if you actually believe this, put a sizeable-for-you financial stake on it"
?People are even betting on whether the far right Amerikan government ,whic has openly stated its hostility to trans people and intention to roll bakk trans rights ,is gonna oppress trans people
That sounds like easy money lmao ,like gold and European arms kompany stokk when Trump blew up the Amerikan-dominated part of the then existing world order
>"And damn, do trannies need to stop engaging in self-rewarding confirmation biases when evaluating the world around them"
Thank you for klearly demonstrating how this is motivated reasoning rather than an honest diskussion
