>>40184233 (OP)
No, it is not true. The LGBT movement was infiltrated by non-LGBT people that are in a vast majority. This happened over the years, like when older gays were troubled about discussing self-described "heterosexual queers" appropriating identification with the rights movements of LGBT. It also became obvious when rallies were hosted for black trans women, where none of the organizers were black themselves, nor were they trans themselves. And it goes back to the late 80s and early 90s when feminist academics wrote about what to do about the "trans question" or how to keep trans women out of feminism and women's spaces, and how to keep trans men firmly entrenched in radical feminist communities. Their solution was to encourage non-binary identities, which served the dual purpose; one, by offering an alternative that also undermined the sexual basis of gender identity; two, it undermined trans voices and turned them into a minority within a minority.
Who would benefit from sewing divisions based on lines of identities which could then further be exploited for monetary gains? Yes, it's the neoliberals again. TERFs were never "turning" right-wing because the LGBT community moved too far left, they were always right-wing because they're neoliberals.
And who would push this kind of rhetoric and normalize it when it's so ridiculous and stupid on the face of it? Again. they used the youth that is too stupid and undereducated. In the same ways that they reinvigorated and intensified racial divisions along identity lines to undermine the poor people's movement. They infiltrated the LGBT movement and did the exact same thing.
It's more true to say that gay men are complicit, because they have most of what they want, in the same way that enbies and radical feminists are complicit, since as they gloated about after recent laws: it doesn't impact them.
This shit has always been, and continues to be, an elaborate neoliberal psyop. Even if that sounds crazy, it's the truth.
