Anonymous
6/28/2025, 2:39:07 AM No.40202827
>Alito argues that the books at issue are objectionable, not just because they feature LGBTQ+ characters, but because they suggest that certain aspects of queer culture should be “celebrated.” One of the contested books is a medieval fairy tale about a prince who marries a knight. According to Alito, the book “relates that ‘on the two men’s wedding day, the air filled with cheer and laughter, for the prince and his shining knight would live happily ever after.’”
>Thus, Alito claims, this book is objectionable not because it includes a same-sex wedding, but because it portrays this wedding as a good thing.
https://www.vox.com/scotus/417974/supreme-court-dont-say-gay-mahmoud-taylor-schools
Fuck you Alito, you prick.
>Thus, Alito claims, this book is objectionable not because it includes a same-sex wedding, but because it portrays this wedding as a good thing.
https://www.vox.com/scotus/417974/supreme-court-dont-say-gay-mahmoud-taylor-schools
Fuck you Alito, you prick.
Replies: