>>40252322 (OP)There's a certain class of LGB and occasionally T; they typically skew older - they seem to be wealthier or at least try to carry themselves that way in a "country club, polite society" kind of way - that are convinced of their superiority and legitimacy over LGBT people outside of this class. Especially superior to T, but that almost goes without saying. Usually this has an "older age bracket(s) resentment towards younger age bracket(s)" flavor to it, their bid for acceptance basically relies on the narrative that they are a good """old school""" gay that doesn't rock the boat unlike these new gays that they propose are a totally different thing and maybe not even real. They rewrite the history of their movements to seem more clean than they actually were. To ingratiate themselves to conservatives, who they inexplicably view as the cool kids they want to fit in with, they'll use old, clinical terms to describe their LGBT status. "Homosexual," "transsexual," etc. - they use those labels as something of a virtue signal; they dedicate a lot of mental energy towards looking for opinions and talking points to please conservatives and only conservatives. Anyway, all of this is to say that you'll be hard pressed to find an LGB person that is enthusiastically Team Rowling (I'm talking beyond simply agreeing with her on one or two of her milder points) that isn't part of this class of LGB(T). Yes, people in this class are pretty weird, universally. Extreme neurodivergence like all LGBT and in some cases profound self-esteem issues, A lot of them are like that Maya detransitioner person. Conservatives find them weird too.