>>40271559>>40271605The methodology of the paper is already suspect from the beginning. It states "Several recent systematic reviews have found the evidence of benefit to be of low or very low certainty". This is a lie by omission. The study nowhere acknowledges the existence of the Utah Review:
https://www.fox13now.com/news/local-news/utah-lawmakers-own-study-found-gender-affirming-care-benefits-trans-youth-will-they-lift-the-treatment-ban
It had a surprising finding since it was commissioned by the Republican state legislature to justify their initial ban on healthcare and their restrictions placed on families and doctors who understand these situations better than politicians.
Quotes from the review:
"Notably, our searches yielded a larger number of primary studies than any of the systematic reviews that underwent data extraction".
"The conventional wisdom among non-experts has long been that there are limited data on the use of GAHT [gender-affirming hormone therapy] in pediatric patients with GD [gender dysphoria]. However, results from our exhaustive literature searches have led us to the opposite conclusion".
https://www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/plentiful-data-no-regret-utah-review
The paper mentions "risks, such as infertility". This is a lie by omission. The paper completely fails to acknowledge promising recent advances in fertility preservation and restoration, such as using SERMs like clomifene or extended sperm search and microfreeze.