It's so strange how literally no one cares that men are dressing up as women because it gets their dicks hard but if a non-black person "dresses up" as a POC character everyone loses their fucking shit.

It's not even logically consistent because women are even more oppressed than black people (femicide is far more common than black hate crimes) and men also had a history of dressing up as women to mock them or forbidding women to join the theater and having men take their roles.

>NOOO YOU CAN'T USE A DARKER FOUNDATION TO PORTRAY THIS POC CHARACTER BECAUSE BLACK PEOPLE GOT DISCRIMINATED AGAINST AND THERE'S A HISTORY OF IT!

But... it's the same thing with women? Lol.

>>40314637 (OP)
I mean women are waking up and some do see it as something equal to black face.

>>40314656
Everything is forgivable if you are, or can pass for, a hot girl

Males on the other hand are expendable

>>40314637 (OP)
true. trannies are ok but crossdressers like in opicrel are kinda weird

>>40314637 (OP)
>reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

>>40314637 (OP)
both women and blacks are privileged
trannies are above women on the progressive stacks but below blacks, so you can't have trans-black

>>40314637 (OP)
anyway what exactly is "dressing up as a woman"
women aren't born with biological clothing you know

>>40314899
They literally cosplay female characters, stuff their bras, pretend to be curvy like women. How is it different from black face?

>>40314637 (OP)
idk, but I would fuck them both

>>40314988
"dressing as a woman" doesn't mean anything more than "dressing as black", though.
anyway, blackface is good and people should do it more. racist mockery is good, because every race needs to be reminded of its absurdities and weaknesses. if blacks could be mocked in public maybe they'd behave better.

>>40314988
the history of slavery and colonisation that treated entire cultures like cattle and then made a mini-industry out of pantomining their physical appearance

>>40315010
women could equally argue they were denied rights or treated like cattle for even longer

but in fact, white men were forced to die in battle by the millions, that's worse than anything we did to women or to blacks

all this resentment is just politics, women want free shit and black people want free shit so they all have their victim narratives, but it just holds them back.

>>40315010
the history of oppression and brutalization of the female sex around the world (that continues on to this DAY where femicide is much more common than "black hate crimes") and having men dress up as women throughout history to mock them or because they didn't give them rights to participate themselves in plays or theaters ... however is irrelevant?

lmao

>>40314637 (OP)
>non-black person
okay lets say an asian
>"dresses up" as a POC character
dresses as an asian character (asians fall under the POC umbrella)
>everyone loses their fucking shit
everyone will lose their shit at an asian dressing up as an asian character?

>>40315240
it's really just white people dressing up as black that the OP means

>>40315245
>>40315240
No, you would definitely get cancelled if you're a japanese person and paint yourself to be a black anime character.

>>40315279
the japanese are considered honorary aryans, in a great example of woke-hitler convergence

>>40314637 (OP)
>because it gets their dicks hard
Mine too.

>if a non-black person "dresses up" as a POC character everyone loses their fucking shit
Only metally ill leftists do this.

>because women are even more oppressed than black people (femicide is far more common than black hate crimes)
Come on, bitch. Nowbody likes whiny victims. Can't you do something else besides whining?

>>40314637 (OP)
>and men also had a history of dressing up as women to mock them or forbidding women to join the theater and having men take their roles
bro this is the stretch of the century

there was never anything remotely like minstrel shows specifically to mock women

>>40315345
>In Shakespearean plays, men dressing up as women was a common theatrical convention, driven by the fact that women were not permitted to act on stage during the Elizabethan era.

They did this in other cultures too.
Women's RIGHTS to play were stripped away and these plays would often show women in an inferior light compared to the male character.

>>40315279
a black anime character is not an asian character

>>40316278
a female anime character isn't a male anime character

>>40314852
>namefagging
>named file
>snarky reaction gif
>catchphrase reply
This is either a bot or a genuine pedophile

>>40316751
emily is a confirmed mega brick hon pedophile

>>40314637 (OP)
Both black face and crossdressing are fine. I never owned a slave and never had more rights than women.

>>40314637 (OP)
what ideology is this

>>40314637 (OP)
God I love big butts and thick thighs so much its unreal

>>40316864
Is there a image screencap with info?

>>40314637 (OP)
>But... it's the same thing with women? Lol.
is it though?

>>40317048
More people die everywhere in the world or get beaten up than black people are for being black.
Women also have been enslaved, raped, kept as breeding cows, stripped away off rights.
Men dressed up as women for entertainment and/or because they removed rights off women to act themselves.

>>40314637 (OP)
Twitter filename. Anyone got sauce?

>>40317431
ok did that happen 100 years ago though?
also are you talking about the enslavement and rape of women that also happened alongside the mass slaughtering and enslavement of men?

>>40317431
men got drafted into wars and slaughtered and we were expected to like it
why is that better than being turned into a slave?
my family members got killed in the first and second world wars
if blacks can bitch about slavery why can't i complain about that? is it because there isn't another race i can blame for it?

>>40317605
>>40317588
You fucktards I'm saying if this happened why is blackface a NO GO but men can dress up as women? It's not logically consistent. Either both is allowed or both is forbidden.

>>40314637 (OP)
>le ragebait
its only really offensive because of historical context anon if we lived in a vacuum wanting a different skin color would be as normal as wishing your face or body was a different shape or wishing your hair or eyes was a different color... or wishing you were the opposite gender

>>40317681
Women have more historical context of being killed, enslaved or raped than black people.

>>40317688
what does that have to do with anything anon? i said theres nothing inherently wrong with either, just race is a much more sensitive issue in current year so it offends people

>>40314637 (OP)
the same thing with women doesnt happen because upon accepting the fact that trans women are women you cannot discriminate against them for being a tranny because it is at the same time discrimination for being a woman, which would fall under the same category as violence on a female. black face on the other hand has nothing that points to someones identity truly being black and is pure mockery through and through.
so you cant have the same thing happen in both because of how we interpret them differently, or at least, you are supposed to. but theres no doubt that the people who think they can see transition as nothing more than a mockery of what should be.

>>40317734
Are more sensitive issues not based on facts. More women are killed for being women than "POCS" for being "POCS"....

>>40317747
Ignore transwomen then, just sissy crossdressers. It's totally fine for men to do it.

>>40317688
>>40314637 (OP)
The outcome depends on if you're hot or not. Arianna Grande switches races every couple years and nobody cares because she's hot.

>>40317761
sissy crossdressers are a myth that transphobes made up. nobody would crossdress on purpose or for attention unless they had some sort of underlying unresolved dysphoria leading to it. theres also a reason women arent opposed to that and its that it inherently breaks gender stereotypes, which they are against. so crossdressing males shouldnt be a threat to them unless theyre terfs

>>40317852
Are you fucking retarded? Countless cismen like dressing up as a sexual thrill and then go about their normal life.

>>40317877
false, have you ever seen it in real life? i doubt it. also women probably are too retarded to comprehend the concept of something giving them a sexual thrill so theyd still fixate on the breaking gender norms stuff and we should probably keep it that way. bonus points if the mans wife decides to play into the fetish and forcefem him. Now were talking progressive

>>40317852
>sissy crossdressers are a myth that transphobes made up.
literally examples before our eyes like sneaky and finnster.

>>40314637 (OP)
I want sneaky to collab with finnster

>>40318037
isnt finnster trans? either way i dont think that many people dislike crossdressers other than terfs conflating them with trans and trans people themselves for ruining their optixx

>>40317877
>>40317939
I crossdress for sexual thrill, it's fun and hot. But you wouldn't come across it unless you're one of my partners.

>>40314637 (OP)
Imagine sneaky bouncing on it good lord

>>40317877
>Are you fucking retarded
No, you are for seriously replying to someone namefagging/tripfagging
You are trying to have a discussion with a paid shill kek

>>40318251
Don't kid yourself, women detest crossdressers and trannies, it's the same stench as a turbo-incel. Bitchy attitudes, talking down to you, insincere interactions- all signs that someone lowkey wishes you would disappear.

There is literally nothing wrong with dressing as a woman or as a basketball American

idc about anything you said i just wonder how vlad is even a thing
he came out of nowhere and he makes his living off being a trap but hes a buff cis man. wtf?

>>40316864
She's actually my girlfriend.

>>40314637 (OP)
Go back bloodshitter
>uh somebody stealing my valor of being a fuckhole is appropriation actually

>>40317431
>enslaved
So did men
>raped
So did men
>kept as breeding sows
Men died in war and were tortured instead
Foids trying to pretend they were the jews in holocaust of history or shit will never cease to amuse me

women are oppressed..
L M F A O

someones new

>>40317036
be sure to lurk, emily likes to post her brickbody

if women were truly opressed like they say, world hunger would be eliminated, and the world would be the cleanest it's ever been.
if men took the same step back that women have lately, the entire energy grid would go down and goods logistics/supply chain would go away and everything would get localized overnight, with mass die offs within 1-3 months.
it would be game over if men slacked as much as women do (in the west)

>>40314637 (OP)
Women are not minorities and have not been discriminated against in any genuine capacity in any period of history. Killing your children is not a right and being a peasant effected all demographics regardless of gender or race.

>>40314637 (OP)
CERTIFIED BLACK EXCELLENCE THREAD, THANKS FOR MAKING THlS OP!!

>>40321301
>>40321324
>>40321996
Men had consistently far more opportunities and rights than women.

Even to this day, femicide happens every day unprovoked. As in women don't go into crime and get killed, they just live a normal life and a man will kill or rape them daily. Deal with it.

>>40314637 (OP)
Politics makes people retarded, what else is on the news?