These perverts seems to desperately want to share toilet with you but they pretend they don't.

How else would you explain their 24/7 screeching about supposed danger you represent in toilets despite zero evidence to support such theory?

There is technically speaking zero need for transition to cum in their holes after entering women toilet. Everyone can enter these toilets no matter if was born with penis or vagina and there is no need for transition to do so.

Not to mention that 90 percent of TERF posting is sexual themed - if not about rapes then about genitalia of trans people.

ERGO:
TERFs are chasers with toilet rape fetish
Q.E.D.

bot posting

>>40330426
yes, you are

Hours later no one even attempted to disprove this. So thesis been proven. Q.E.D.

actually true. for example JK rowling is just bothered he cant fuck his boymoder daughter

>>40331567
ha

>>40330414 (OP)
TERFs give themselves away when they talk about wanting to ban porn. At first the disciplined TERFs will say, "oh its the AGP porn that ruins men, ban it and fix men" but the longer they talk they veer into, "ban all porn". Now banning all porn is a common chorus among some feminists, but TERFS want to ban all porn because they are unfuckably old and ugly and they think a total porn ban would get men to speak to them again like in their youth. They really believe theres whole crowds of men who would otherwise be asking them out on dates if it wasn't for pornhub.

>>40333337
That actually makes a lot of sense.

>>40333390
Like an average feminist might want to ban porn because its 1. degrading to women 2. creates unrealistic expectations which hurt men and women both and 3. facilitates trafficking. I'm not saying those have no merit, but the TERFs don't really elaborate those points, TERFs just have this sense that banning porn is eliminating their perceived "competition" in the sexual marketplace, not the other externalities that other feminists talk about.

TRVTHNVKE

>>40333459
Yea, TERFs always seem to end on the topic of fucking sooner or later. They indeed seem to be deeply sexually frustrated.

terfs are real women
trans women are men
trannies are jealous that terfs are something they can never be

>>40333754
>terfs are real mentally ill women
FTFY

>>40333754
>trannies are jealous that terfs are something they can never be
virginis to the grave?

>>40333795
mental illness is a meaningless accusation

>>40333845
vestal virgins were highly regarded in the roman era

>>40333859
>mental illness is a meaningless accusation
yes, TERFs don't seem to get that

>vestal virgins
were expected to lose virginity at some point
preserving virginity till death at elderly age was seen as aberration

>>40330414 (OP)

Aren't you lot the people the keep on screaming about the so-called "trans genocide"?
The ones that say that misgendering is literal violence and will kill trans people?
The ones that say not putting trans "women" in female sports will "deny their existence"?

You lot have a persecution fetish.

On the other hand, there's a real reason to stop tranny shenanigans.

https://reduxx.info

>>40333738
It is absolutely no accident England is TERF island. The old saw was, "The beauty and culinary skills of English women created the greatest nation of sailors and explorers the world has ever known"

The genetics of England have so desperately interbred that the native uglies are going to elaborate lengths to get men to marry/breed them. Its not working. It won't work.

British women are so spiritually insulted that men would rather grow little A cup boobies and jerk off in the mirror than fuck them. But they have only themselves to blame, TERFs are absolute dumptrucks.

>>40334773
>and culinary skills
may it explain the toilet part, I wonder

Preach

>>40334408
>You lot have a persecution fetish.
I don't. And what persecution you mean? I'm not trans in case you think that I see TERFs yapping 24/7 about how endangered they are in toilets as a form of attack on me.

>ITT TERFs thinking only trans people see them as nutjobs

>>40330414 (OP)
lmao

>>40335864
but seems plausible

>>40337122
tru