Thread 40351594

giwtwm

>>40351594 (OP)
What of value has this dude actually added to discourse around trans people?

rule of D
they're just closet gay

>>40351601
he laid out the framework to help every trans person understand the origin of their dysphoria. it’s better to know.

cis men are males
males that have sex with other males are homosexual
its impossible for mildly masochistic males that allow themselves to be anally penetrated by another man at the request of dominant females to be straight

>>40351610
So I had gender dysphoria since I was little either because I was a autosexual pervert or a homosexual man with a different dating strategy, fantastic. Also ftms don't exist apparently.

>>40351594 (OP)
did he "write about it" or "live it"?

>>40351610
He didn't help me understand anything at all.

>>40351610
its mostly incomplete horseshit though and doesnt at all explain the variety of experiences of trans people

>>40351601
its only divided trans people and given ammunition to transphobes

>>40351647
yes, basically. he was right about everything.
>>40351654
honestly that’s because you’re in denial, not because his work didn’t hold merit
>>40351671
it’s not horseshit there’s mountains of evidence he was 100% correct. if you’ve spent time around hsts and agps you’ll know that he was entirely accurate

What sexuality do I have if the woman commanding me is in my head getting off at this masc faggot yaoi dream? Am I straight

40351594

>>40351728
>there’s mountains of evidence he was 100% correct.
LMAO
>blanchard your theory fails to explain almost half of all trannies
>they are lying

>>40351647
correct
i assume you prefer thinking that your soul embodies the feminine platonic ideal and that is why you enjoy shoving things up your ass, you know, like all cis women tend to do in their spare time?

>>40351728
im not saying those two dont exist; im saying there is more experience and reasons beyond those two buckets everyone gets put into

neither of them fit me; and im not just saying that

anyone have the screenshot of his post where he was talking about men whose ideal partner was a trans woman who was physically indistinguishable from a cis woman

>>40351601
He was the first to accurately describe the trans phenomenon
Before him the best theory was John Moneys which amounted to “we cut a boys dick off and he was sad, thus trans people exist”

>>40351823
No, she probably just thinks that psychology is a pseudoscience for hacks and retards and that the intersex neurology/womb hormonal environment theory makes way more sense and has infinitely more explanatory power.

>>40353912
That's wildly incorrect on like 7 levels. The reimer experiment was actually meant to disprove the concept of an inherent gender identity, and therefore prove that trans people should be 'cured' through therapy and not transition. This case narrative was disproven by a biologist named Milton Diamond who tracked Reimer down and who proposed purely biological factors as the underlying cause of trans identities (as well as advocating strongly against nonconsensual surgery on intersex infants because he was just cool like that). Blanchtard and his pseudoscientific theory are also simply not correct, just more armchair navel-gazing from the worst academic discipline of all time.

ha ha, how you just going to describe me