>>40404782one is attracted to their partner, the androphillia of hsts
the other is attracted to the self, the meta attraction of agp
transbians and bi-shits get their panties in a bunch when they're told their sexuality falls into the ago category. they'll be like, but i don't get a boner from putting panties on! ya? so? that's transvestic fetishism. seperate from agp. agp is how the self engages in sexual activity. the people that argue against agp argue because they don't want to be lumped in with what are classically seen as perverts and rapehons. they'll argue for a cluster c. there isn't one.
it's literally: sexually arroused by the partner vs sexually arroused by the self. that's the true distinction between hsts and agp. heterosexual men don't troon out to become transbians because they worship the woman they sleep with. meaning their sexuality revolves around their partner and their presentation is to both attract and please their partner.
you guys don't understand foundational concepts which is why you think you have valid criticisms for the blanchardian dichotomy. if you don't understand attraction vs meta-attraction then you missed the point of hsts vs agp.