>>40451219I am very familiar with this claim. You realize it could be the case that women on average have a slightly "lower ceiling" in their neurological development while having almost no bearing on "logic and analysis" capability or tendency, right?
I suspect your own IQ, educational attainment, intellectual achievement, and career progress is quite lackluster. Social liberalism is consistently shown to be correlated with such things (as is economic conservatism). So it's the pot calling the kettle black here. The only thing stupider than blank slatism is biological essentialism.
Also, how does this change if you start an XX on exogenous testosterone at a very young age? Who knows, but it's very plausible you might get something closer to the male developmental cycle.