>>40469130>(and it isn't) it absolutely is. they do it to "prove" their concept of "new antisemitism" (an idea created by, of all people, Alan Dershowitz (who also has significant financial interests in Israel)) because it's an unfalsifiable argument that shoots down all criticism of Israel as inherently bigoted. if you believe all anti-Zionism is inherently antisemitic you never have to engage with any anti-Zionist points.
>that's not exactly a defense moments after being antisemitici agree that antisemitism is still wrong but you don't have any moral highground when you advocate for genocide.