Thread 40642880

>actually blanchardism isn't true because it doesn't hold up to any scrutiny empirically
>read this theory. No it doesn't make any arguments. No it doesn't cite any data. Yes it's just anecdotes and cliches written in an Audre Lordecore style. But it sounds nice and feels right, so if you don't believe it, you're transphobic
What did the Trans Movement mean by this? How did it get to this unserious of a point?

>>40642880 (OP)
You spend too much time here. The only trans space where blanchardism isn’t ridiculed is /tttt/; it is not prevalent in any other trans space. It’s mostly believed by modern internet right wingers.
Even here it feels more like it’s used kinda tongue-in-cheek most of the time instead of being fully serious.

>>40642918
Not my point though. My point is that Blanchardism gets rejected for failing to meet a standard that most of muh Theory never even gets held to. It's just as true as most of what wokes have to say about most things.

>>40642880 (OP)
To what theory do you allude?