Thread 40680721

It's... honestly a breath of fresh air. This perspective rings so true, I can't find fault in it at all.

It's so simple, why didn't anyone say something sooner?

all fields

>>40680721 (OP)
most british image ive ever seen in my life

>>40680818
>eejits
This is the colonial legacy of the angloid but the Irish spirit remains

>>40680721 (OP)
I never thought I'd find myself standing on the wrong side, and with my feet so firmly planted too! I thought I was being kind.

I don't blame the backlash we're getting honestly, once it clicks you realize how insane this all has been.

>>40680721 (OP)
posting AI slop without disclosing its origin in advance should in most cases be regarded as a denial-of-service attack on your brain. the poster isn't trying to convince you of anything, they're just trying to waste your time. it should be a crime or at the very least a civil offense, and it should be legal to respond with whatever force is necessary to prevent future offenses.
the robot can generate this trash faster than you can see and respond to it, if think you have to give it any attention at all you're doomed.

>>40680947
>everything is AI
What's supposed to be AI about this? Maybe try reading, the infographic comes from a guy named Eliot Ranch on Twitter.

>>40680721 (OP)
im bisexual

>>40680980
the cartoon people are very obviously AI (the bearded guys in particular are extremely obvious, in isolation i might not have caught some of the others)
the text is therefore probably also AI, because the source is someone who has already demonstrated willingness to post unmarked AI slop

>>40681013
Hmm, that sure sounds like a lame attempt to justify dismissing the text without engaging with it.

>>40680721 (OP)
And then you felt the need to go and shit up our board with your minimum effort slop thats been posted a billion times.
Also reddit spacing.

wow, this pic was life changing. ive been trans for 20 years but now i see that all trannies need to be forcefully injected with high-dose testosterone. or something

>>40680721 (OP)
im all of them all the time

>>40681028
i am making an argument for dismissing an entire reference class of content without engaging with it, yes.
that is because you literally do not have the hours in the day to read every piece of AI-generated spam, let alone process and respond to it, and attempting to do so incentivizes your enemies to use it to neutralize you. i wouldn't even bother arguing with you about it, because you know exactly what you're doing, except that i think it's a useful thing to point out to other people who happen to read this thread.

being trans is a form of neurological intersex

>>40681126
Nah, that's called being gay.

>>40681118
Yes, dismissing something because it uses art that you vibe-check as AI is very intellectually honest and reasonable.

>>40681298
>that's called being gay.
what?

>>40681312
You heard me, neurological intersex is called being gay.
They did studies long before "trans" became a thing and found that homosexual brains shared similarities to brains of the opposite sex.

>>40681362
>>40681126
>>40681298
some homosexuality is probably caused by being neurally intersex (i'm not convinced gay male exclusive tops are, and that's rare enough that it actually could be something else)
approximately all transness is caused by being neurally intersex
https://sinceriously.blog-mirror.com/intersex-brains-and-conceptual-warfare/

>>40681400
Intersex is a genital birth defect, there are no intersex conditions of the brain, unless you're talking about gay brains which are similar to straight brains of the opposite gender.

>>40681362
>>40681400
exactly, and that doesn't mean being trans isn't also a form of neurological intersex - sex is a bimodal system with a spectrum of expression across many different neurological networks and individual regions as well as bodily physical traits, and this applies to both sexual identity and orientation as generally sexually dimorphic traits

the "trans umbrella" is not a thing and that ancient /pol/ "infographic" is misleading for reasons they don't even understand when it's actually all under the intersex umbrella, and that doesn't erase or degrade the distinctions therein

>>40681524
dumbass

>>40681524
>Intersex is a genital birth defect
there's some debate among experts about which definition is best, but imo a definition so strict it doesn't even include klinefelter is silly

>>40681529
Sex isn't bimodal, traits that we consider masculine or feminine are bimodal. Sex itself is binary.

>ancient /pol/ "infographic"
It's from October 2024 and there are no expiration dates on facts, dumbass.

>>40681788
>facts
where?

>>40680721 (OP)
I feel like if your infographic relies on just calling half the people you’re criticising idiots without actually explaining why then it’s not very useful.

>>40681607
They should rename the disease while they're at it! Intersex is a misnomer, these people are still either male or female.

>>40681802
The whole thing, it frames the current situation perfectly. What do you think it gets wrong?

>>40680721 (OP)
That only applies to ftms and even then, only to a minority of them.

>>40681923
I think this applies to both, but FTMs have an extra slew of misogyny-inspired "justifications" for jumping on this bandwagon.

>>40681860
lol, you say the same thing every time
it has no sources and is literally just conjecture and rhetoric

>>40681860
anon asked you about facts and this response is about framing.
there are only two numbers in the entire infographic: "three" and "one" in the header. this is a bad sign for something which purports to be about material reality. it's full of vague generalities rather than concrete claims which can be refuted or proven.
this is because, again, its purpose is to waste people's time.

>>40682071
>its purpose is to waste people's time.
true, but mods don't care and it's mildly gratifying to poke the obvious holes in it

Newfag tip: If you enter "sage" as the first letter into the options tip you won't have to keep bumping trash to the top of the catalog

>>40682009
Try engaging your brain! You don't need a peer reviewed paper to think. Read, reflect, reason.

>>40682130
>You don't need a peer reviewed paper to think
what about anything in this exchange suggests I believe anything like that?
>Read, reflect, reason.
read what? your hateful anti-trans rhetoric? I did, and I reject it, because it is rooted in fiction

>>40682142
>what about anything in this exchange suggests I believe anything like that?
Dismissing everything and demanding sources.

Let me hold your hand.

The Vulnerable > Who:
* People struggling with mental health disorders
* Teens struggling with e.g. CSA, sexuality, puberty, autism.

Agree or disagree?
What sources would you like?

>>40682185
are you schizophrenic?

>>40681821
Yah this is the biggest red flag, it relies on the kinda logic that transitioning is bad bc it’s bad—so anyone who has done it or supports it is bad. AND ITS JUST BAD BC… IT IS! If you buy this kinda thing you are v susceptible to propaganda.

>>40682196
No, I'm not. Are you willing to engage with ideas that trigger your cognitive dissonance?

>>40682322
I certainly am, while you seem not to be, but nothing about this triggers a sense of cognitive dissonance in me as all you've presented thus far is propaganda and rhetoric rooted in conjecture with no material basis to try and detract from the rights of minority groups to exist

>>40682331
"Trans" isn't a minority, it's a malpractice.

Now, back to this:

The Vulnerable > Who:
* People struggling with mental health disorders
* Teens struggling with e.g. CSA, sexuality, puberty, autism.

Agree or disagree?
What sources would you like?

>>40682429
>X isn't Y, it's Z
i know what you are

>>40682516
X is X, actually.