>>40732501
>fetishistic objectified version of a trans woman
which is what? i want the transwoman I'm interested in to be attractive. am I being an objectifying asshole for that? how about if i want her to have her dick because, 1, i'm not a fan of genital procedures having had a circumcision that causes me daily pain and I don't wish it on anyone, and 2, i want her to feel the full pleasure of her genitals as it was created. not be something she lives in fear/shame of. I don't want to deal with that.
>they don't want a transsexual. they want transvestites
how do you arrive at this? a transvestite would be less likely to do the things that let them pass effectively and would be more embarrassing to be out with in public as it would be easier to tie it to a fetish. so why would they be preferred? doesn't make sense.
>they see them as males
this is 100% factual. is this an issue? you can be male and i can still treat you as a woman. didn't people separate sex and gender to make it easier for them to push trans ideology but then constantly try to pull a sleight of hand to equate the two when convenient. sex and gender being different are the conditions transpeople put forth and them's the conditions i accepted.
>care about the dick
if they only cared about the dick, surely they'd just stick to CDs?