Thread 40760279

Are transsexuals ontologically opposed to mutual versatility in amabXamab relationships?

no my gf and I are verse4verse

>>40760345
yeah but only because you both take hrt

id join the westboro but instead of hating gays and soldiers they hate vers church

>>40760346
....what? You said transsexual of course we're on hrt

>>40760351
hating vers IS hating gays

>>40760354
the hrt is a reflection of your opposition to unaltered mutual penetration
why can't you just put penises in each other au natural rather than taking a chemical that alters your libido?

>>40760360
I mean the point isn't to alter the libido, you know that right? please tell me you know that

>>40760360
im a gay dude and me and my bf are verse lmao

>>40760355
i mean yeah but they hate gays in a different way than i do. we are not the same or something

>>40760378
>but they hate gays in a different way than i do
why does that matter if the end result is the same?

>>40760279 (OP)
Verses don’t exist
Topping once or twice doesn’t make a bottom a vers and vice versa
All gays are either primarily tops or bottoms

>>40760392
>get into this tiny box you stupid faggot

yes

>>40760279 (OP)
No, why would I?

>>40760395
>>40760279 (OP)
>>40760355
In case you haven't noticed, this board and this site as a whole has extremely heteronormative views. I would say it's more of a stigma against femme people in general

>>40760851
this board worships femme amabs and is terrified to criticize them ever

>>40760696
because you think masc have to be dom and fem have to be subs

>>40760982
>let me tell you about your beliefs

you spend any time in actual lgbt circles instead of this shithole and you'll see that most gay people are some flavour of vers

>>40761012
that was not my experience trying to date online
very polarized world
some vers - sure but a lot of gay men are very neurotic about what they will or won't do