>>40816148
Why are you replying to me with that as if I disagree.
The only thing I disagree with is you saying "being transgender" but that's just me arguing semantics and language.
I've disagreed that you can "be transgender" since day 1 back in 2011 when I decided to try a male to female transition.
Yes, you can be mentally ill, yes you can be a tranny (someone who takes transgender actions), but you can't "BE" a series of actions you're taking.
That'd be like me saying you can "BE" break dancing, and that "being" break dancing is spinning on your head, doing the worm, etc.
It just always sounded so fucking retarded.