Thread 40823062

If men looked like this nobody would be straight or lesbian, therefore bisexuality is the default

>>40823062 (OP)
If men looked like that I would still lose all attraction upon seeing their dick

>>40823062 (OP)
Too girly

>>40823062 (OP)
Congratulations, you've come to the correct conclusion that sexual orientation is largely a social construct. There's more to men than twinky femboys ofc though

>>40823297
tranny penises are very womanly and as they plap your pink canal it will be very lesbian sex!!
also you get free spermies

>>40823062 (OP)
if men looked like that society would be fixed

>>40823297
cope, thats the best part

>>40823339
If it had to be that way I would rather give her the free spermies :3

If [hypotheoretical scenario that's far-removed from reality],
therefore [moronic conclusion].

>>40823062 (OP)
If all men looked like this, ngl, it would be really funny to see there still being sexism while both sexes look literally the same

>>40823339
For real, they're tiny, sensitive, soft and hairless. Simply adorable and feminine

>>40824955
There would be less ideas about "strength" or other things, but the fact that women are the ones who go through pregnancy would probably lead to something. Not sure what, but something

>>40825063
There probably still would be some patriarchy because of that.

Men are still the ones who impregnate women, while women are the ones who bear children.
This might lead to the state of things that men still will be the warrior caste simply due to the fact that they don't have to nurture children in their bellys for 9 months, and them being the warrior caste could lead them to being the ruler caste. Eventually this would lead to some stereotypes that women are better-off staying at home, raising children, while men are the one who protect them and rule over them essentially. Despite what you said this could even potentially lead to notion of women being weaker than men, but unlike in our reality it'd be purely social and not backed by any biology.

So, the core for sexism ideals actually wouldn't be that different from our reality all things considered, but they wouldn't be amplified by other differences between sexes and thus would be weaker and less all-encompassing, especially in modern day.

>>40825337
There's also the fact that a huge part of sexism’s persistence historically has come from immediacy.

Fact is, you can usually instantly see someone’s sex from a glance, so stereotypes and prejudices kick in before you even know the person.
Institutions were built on that. Norms, dress codes, division of labor, even laws. In the world where that visual cue simply doesn't exist, sexism would be structurally crippled.

Institutions would struggle to enforce gender roles, because you can’t even easily separate “who’s who” without asking.
A lot of gendered assumptions in jobs, politics, and religion that exist in our reality, would not exist just from sheer impracticality of enforcing them.

In the end, sexism might still exist, but it would shift from being a visual, daily experience to being a structural or cultural thing (religious doctrine, inheritance laws, “men should do X jobs”, even if nobody can spot the difference at first glance), and it might be weaker and more secondary, with other bigotries like racism or classism surpassing it in importance and enforcement.

>ITT
>porn addicted incels

>>40823062 (OP)
That's a fictional character

>>40825442
Idk about others in this thread, but I'm honestly very curious about it from a worldbuilding perspective. Imagining how would sexism develop and what would it be like in this alternative reality where men look almost indistinguishable from women is fascinating. That would be very different culture we'd have, and while OP probably didn't think of it that seriously, I do find this idea very interesting for speculative sociology and history