Thread 40931992

how is being atracted to kids, even if you don't engage with them, way more critized and looken upon than chopping your genitalia

>>40931992 (OP)
have you seen when the africans do it? the ones with the bones in their nose? it looks badass that is why its not criticized

>>40931992 (OP)
>how is traumatizing children, even if you only fantasize about traumatizing children, way more criticized that doing body modifications at your own risk?

>>40931992 (OP)
kill yourself!

>>40932003
This.

>>40931992 (OP)
i am so thankful to wake up every day knowing that i'm not this fucking retarded. consider suicide.

>>40932003
>blah blah blah muh body muh choice

kill yourself faggot

>>40932036
your brain has been consumed by the popular media. no wonder why you are a tranny, if ZOG ask you to take your estrogen, you are going to do it like a good goy boy...

>>40932003
children can consent btw. if you are saying that children can't consent then you are taking them for granted. you know how many boy kids would love to fuck an older woman? fuck, its even a thing when they reach adulthood "why i wasn't groomed by a mommy milf"

>>40931992 (OP)
me chopping off my dick doesnt hurt anyone else?
being a pred traumatizes a person for life

>>40932065
evil nigga. arrest this man.

>>40932068
just to make things clear, i am not a MAP nor i am atracted to kids. if i was, i would say it without remorse. i just belive pedophiles should be included on the LGBT community and we should expulse trannies out. this actually was though before by the man who organized the stonewall parade. trannies are mentally ill dilaters who enjoy mutilation and MAPs are literally people who are atracted to kids and can't avoid it like a gay cant avoid being gay or a lesbian cant avoid being lesbian or a bi or a straight. there is a great difference. the only reason why we have trannies instead of pedos is because "muh independence". i would feel way more comfortable around pedophiles than around trannies

>>40932084
SCARY MF WROTE A PARAGRAPH ABOUT LITTLE KIDS

>>40932066
lmao this kind of argument falls short. yeah no idc about your body rights. i dont think the model of "individualistic self-independence" is doing any favour to humanity, rather, is ruining it and i couldn't care more. morphing your body to be something that is not you goes against the role of nature, but being atracted to someone who is biologically able to get pregnant and give birth is what nature intended. there is no manner of speech or philosophy that can go against the nature of the world

>>40932092
>durr durr scary guy makes a point that i can't refute

kys

>>40932098
>against the role of nature
your nature is to go to a labor camp and work for rich people
who cares go make more money for investors and maybe you will afford to take your child bride on a date

>>40932126
no thank you, i am not a pedo

>>40931992 (OP)
>how is being atracted to kids, even if you don't engage with them, way more critized and looken upon than chopping your genitalia

>Why is somebody that is 100% considered a risk to children criticized more than the people that are perhaps a 60% risk?

>>40932098
>i dont think the model of "individualistic self-independence" is doing any favour to humanity, rather, is ruining it
i dont care about your favors to humanity, and if you actually care, you should know that fucking kids definitely isnt doning any favours to anyone
>nature intended
nature has no intention, but i do. and freaks like us existing only proves that nature is utterly random

>>40932152
the fuck you mean 100% danger? nigga there is a lot of pedophiles who do not act upon their desires since that would be rape. in the same way there are trans repressors and homosexuals that dont engage in gay sex

>>40932174
lol you are a sore loser

>>40932174
also, of course you dont care about humanity, you dont care about anything and you live on an eternal state of nihilism. that's why you are a hon with suicidal tendencies