>>40952552
>Perceived by others
That's not exactly something you have jurisdiction over though, is it? The only inalienable right we have is to think for ourselves. So calling yourself a woman when you're not perceived as one and relying on the state to force people to recognize it, isn't exactly fulfilling the premise.
If you ask me, gender seems to be an arbitrary collection of traits defined by social and cultural values, attributed as Internet to a particular sex. Though that begs the question, if the values are mutable, how do you know what they are, and if they are attributed to a sex you aren't, how can they be attributed to you?
But I don't really understand the premise. It seems zero gravity. The only solid points are dysphoria a symptom of depression so severe you dissociate and with gender having such a strong presence in the zeitgeist that's an understandable avenue of expression, autogynophilia, and the campest of twinks that are so enamored by men, they assume the attitudes of a woman to make themselves more attractive to their desired mates. But it's still so conceptual.
It makes more sense from the non binary perspective. As in the traits attributed to a sex are so arbitrary, there's no reason either sex can't assume them. Yes it's limited by biology, but that doesn't mean any act a trans person undertakes is necessarily irrational. It's just self expression.
But as I understand it, this is apparently offensive to suggest this.
Honestly though, I'm willing to concede that I don't know shit about shit. Wish I did get it though. Maybe it's one of those cognitive bias this that exists alongside my belief that men and women aren't so fundamentally different, despite everyone harping on that they are, at least before society conditions them into gender roles. Also don't that what I say too seriously. If believing I'm wrong helps you function, don't indulge my musings. I'd prefer happiness over being right.