Thread 40963875

misandry is actually misogyny, especially if experienced by a trans woman

misandry isn't real

>>40964122
This, it's an antiquated term.
It's just called feminism now.

>>40964250
women are marketing geniuses, they know what sells

>>40963875 (OP)
close enough, but it actually wasnt ever misandry at all. the "misandry" that men experience when they dont live up to patriarchal standards is actually a byproduct of misogyny. they see them as women and therefore less, because its misogynistic.

Did God create woman from Adam's rib? There aren't any missing ribs in men so why does this myth exist? Did men want women so badly that they felt like a piece of themselves was torn away and given to women?

>>40964337
>god

>>40964362
the most high almighty

>>40964337
men wanted to be women so badly that they wanted to blame women for stealing their woman part away yes. it even sounds like it makes sense actually

>>40964419
I wish people could stop blaming women, when women are basically always innocent.

Midandry isn't real and misogyny is a byproduct of a hierarchical society, by low rank 'master' against any class 'slave'. High ranking master-demographics don't show the same hostility towards the slaves as low ranking ones.

Today, nearly everyone is a slave and thinking that you are a master is what makes you a slave.

>>40964474
how do we elevate women in the hierarchy?

>>40963875 (OP)
Fucking feeble minded snowflakes. If your biggest problem is getting called sir when you're a MAN maybe growing up wrapped in wool didn't do you any good. Must be nice not having any REAL FUCKING PROBLEMS if only you would shut the fuck up about fake oppression

>>40964517
im a woman!

>>40963875 (OP)
not this bullshit again

>>40964122
Mysogyny isn't real.

>>40964716
then why do people say it is?

>>40964426
trvue... but i understand they cant help it when it hurts so much to not be able to fully be one

>>40964594
>sage in namefield
fag

>>40963875 (OP)
You guys are only mean to Serano because she's a hon, if it was a passoid who said the same things as her she would be seen as genius

>>40964908
she is a passoid

>>40964926
she's still nerdy, I'm talking about bimbofied passoids

>>40963875 (OP)
Posted it again award

>>40964971
problem with nerds?

>>40964994
I'm one myself lol
just that people would prefer to listen to someone who's really appealing and attractive and Serano isn't
if it was Hunter Schafer or Blaire White who said what Serano said everyone would say they are based and some shit like that, instead of mocking them like they constantly do with Serano

>>40964740
Money. Power. Politics.
>>40964330
>close enough, but it actually wasnt ever misandry at all. the "misandry" that men experience when they dont live up to patriarchal standards is actually a byproduct of misogyny. they see them as women and therefore less, because its misogynistic.
That's only half of it. Feminists see men as abusers and therefore less. I'm one for that misandry and mysogyny both exist and feed on one another.
>>40964337
>Did God create woman from Adam's rib? There aren't any missing ribs in men so why does this myth exist? Did men want women so badly that they felt like a piece of themselves was torn away and given to women?
Lies. Give me back my rib. NOW.
>>40964474
>Midandry isn't real and misogyny is a byproduct of a hierarchical society, by low rank 'master' against any class 'slave'. High ranking master-demographics don't show the same hostility towards the slaves as low ranking ones.
>
>Today, nearly everyone is a slave and thinking that you are a master is what makes you a slave.

Then what do you call hating men for no reason and denying their humanity and indivuality for no reason? What do you call centering women as if that's a justification to needlessly step on the feelings and well-being of half the population? I'd maybe believe you, if "not all men" wasn't a demonic incantation in the ears of every afab.

Women are the low-rank "master" in the sense that men are all abusers and so she gets to exert whatever power she wants over him and have it encouraged in the name of social justice.

You're right that we shouldn't be treating other people this way, in any case. People are people, not monsters or slaves or masters or what have you. It should be simple.

>>40965145
>for no reason
men commit most crime

>>40965161
Do I commit the most crime? Or are you just using that to justify not treating me like a human? Are you REALLY taking the same route as actual racists and not seeing the irony at all?

>>40965161
And I say "I" and "me" to refer to all men. I'm speaking for men. It's not personal.

>>40964495
That's the thing, there are already women of the master class, same as men. The class isn't determined by some shit like ethnicity or gender, it's mostly about money and how much power you have to exert your will onto others.

>>40965145
>what do you call hating men for no reason or putting women on a pedestal (sic)
I call it the trap that ignorant liberals and foolish leftists fall into - identity politics. Basically taking an intro to feminist lit class in community college and falling victim to the dunning krueger effect. Many such cases, lotta women be dumb as shit. Men fall into it too but typically the opposite way where they are inundated with messaging towards women (and by the aforementioned dunning krueger libshit women) and start to doubt their own place in the world based off of failing to meet arbitrary standards of masculinity imposed on them through subversive messaging about what would otherwise be considered an alright message for everyone. The real culprit at the end of the day is consumerism fueled hyper individualistion of society that commodifies personality. Think capitalism in the labor market, but instead of capitalism, it's neo-lib feminism in the dating market. So, i guess, also capitalism.

>>40966339
So you don't like capitalism?

would

>>40966339
>using class reductionism + vulgar economism to insert reactionary ideology
oh boy! you're so clever and original

>>40968288
Who are they reacting to?