>>40989771 (OP)
I wouldn’t even care if it was just the trans flag attached to the pride flag since it’s been LGBT for a long while. But we don’t need a stripe on the flag for niggers.
>>40989771 (OP)
I wouldn't drop the T
I would however support removing the extra stripes from the flag
it was stupid virtue signaling from a now defunct brand of juvenile leftism, and I think everyone would agree it's ugly
>>40989866
I genuinely think the new flag looks better aesthetically. People's preference for the original is the most obvious case of "old thing good because old" mindrot, or typically appeals to uncreative people that like plain more than bold (ie, natural-born conservatives)
>>40990187
yeah it's a point that I think is lost on LGB people... dropping the T realistically isn't possible since most of the T is bi. And even the straight Ts are considered gay in the eyes of conservatives and ironically most of the LGB Drop the T people themselves. If a trans person isn't asexual then at least 50% of the population considers them some kind of LGB regardless of their stated sexuality lmao
>>40990267
yeah but you're still stuck with them.. they're gonna be in """your""" community and they're still going to be advocating for themselves. I mean I guess you could ostracize them for doing so, but at some point that 'conscience' thing most people ditched around 2020 has gotta kick in again right? You also have to contend with the still-majority of people that are cool with and ally with transgender people. Ostracize them too? I guess??? Impossible political project with no benefits.
>>40990283
no not really I don't have to invite them to gay events or mention them by name
even semantic separation and going back to referring to gay people by name instead of "LGBT" or "queer" is huge
trans people are massive homophobes and I want nothing to do with you
if we had a dedicated gay board on 4chan, nobody would talk to trannies except chasers
>>40990303
ur not inviting anyone to anything come tf on. please don't even bother with the reply making up that you're as a matter of fact an extremely influential member of the community or whatever, spare us
>>40990303
Most of "gay movement" before the 70s was pedophilia and raped women uniting in hatred of men
Guess that's what you want to go back to? It is quite accurate for the LG kek
>>40990130
no you idiot its because stripes aren't supposed to be mixed and matched. horizontal goes with horizontal and vertical goes with vertical and diagonal goes with diagonal. also it destroys the color scheme
>>40992148 >flag is broken and tattered >barely held with any respect, clearly only made for a photo >the hand >pathetic attempts at seeming cool which only look corny >crowd in the back (that's probably 90+% straight as per the percentages of lgb alliance members) >no person below 30, most looks over mid 40s/50 >all british (ghoul phenotypes)
grim
>>40989771 (OP)
I am trans but there shouldn't be anything on the flag except the classical rainbow colors. The rainbow color represents all humans under the rainbow, yes even the cis and straights, that's why it is retarded to put colors for specific groups. How are people media illiterate about a static image?
