Thread 40997112

Would men really prefer to date a butterface cis girl like this over a passoid? Like, the face is the part that people present to the world, the rest of the body is covered in clothes. So even if the passoid has a rather male-ish fridgebod, no one would ever know, and everyone would judge you for dating an ugly-faced girl because no one would ever see her banging body

>Would men really prefer to date a butterface cis girl like this over a passoid?
yeah. most guys don't wanna have sex with a guy and do want to have biological children. also, even if a trans person passes visually, it's slim pickings for those who actually act like women.

>>40997134
acting like a woman is literally the worst part of women, lol. men constantly despair over the fact that if they want hole it comes attached to a woman personality

>>40997112 (OP)
Even if they pass and look better than the girl in your pic, I'm still picking her those hips and thighs are womanly and most trans girls don't have hips and thighs like that. I would still choose her even if she was trans also. Body > Face (to some extent).

>>40997112 (OP)
yes; not that men's propensity to fuck anything remotely female should be understated, but the carrot-on-the-stick of womb access is the subconscious motivation behind men dating women and putting up with their nonsense

>>40997112 (OP)
Shes not ugly?

>>40997159
well we don't want to conflate things. guys looking for "hole" exclusively are more likely to be wary of the personality of the chick they're hooking up with, but if they want to date someone with the intention of being long-term partners - not just fwb - they're more willing to take what they can get - even if they complain about the particular women here and there.
but anyways, while I should've been clearer, I brought it up because 1. even most guys who bang trans women aren't fully comfortable with it and want to think about the fact that they're guys as little as possible: so, if they act like autistic men, which they're more likely to do, it's going to make them think of that fact more; and 2. it's likely to make the visual passing less prominent, and guys are naturally going to worry about that aspect revealing to others that they're actually dating a guy.

>>40997112 (OP)
>Would men really prefer to date a butterface cis girl like this over a passoid?
Yes.
Trans people are all going to concentration camps.
Why invest in a short term relationship.
Unless they are rich and you get in on the will.

>>40997112 (OP)
why do you post this like some kind of own. like, yes? she's hot and in no world would being with a tranny be any better lol

>>40997112 (OP)
yeah, picrel's face is ok enough and her body is goddess-tier
gay men are so retarded

>>40997112 (OP)
>Would straight men really prefer to date a woman over a man who looks like a woman?

>>40997112 (OP)
>So even if the passoid has a rather male-ish fridgebod, no one would ever know, and everyone would judge you for dating an ugly-faced girl because no one would ever see her banging body
This is one retarded assumption because nearly every girl out there is putting their body on display, just like your image

>>40997112 (OP)
Yes, what's confusing about this?

>>40997159
Salt mentality

>>40997112 (OP)
shes not ugly but she looks hotter in the thumnbail

>>40997112 (OP)
yes she's hot as fuck and has a pussy that can grip

Fuck off vieo