Thread 41461122

It's been years and some of youse are still saying this shit. Can one of youse who actually says this explain why it's not retarded and self-defeating?

>>41461122 (OP)
No one here is saying that.

>>41461129
Plenty of you are.

>>41461122 (OP)
I identify as an anime girl

>>41461131
im saying that but im not explaning that and i also look like that

>>41461122 (OP)
no one but a woman would ever want to be a woman
many women (actual women not repressed trans men) do not want to be women, for entirely valid reasons (not wanting to be raped, not wanting a period, not wanting to be someone's domestic slave, not wanting to be valued solely by beauty, the list goes on)

a trans woman is evidently a woman because being a woman is not a choice someone would willingly make without the impetus of dysphoria forcing the decision

>>41461147
im a woman but i dont want to be a woman so you are wrong and also stupid

>>41461147
>>41461122 (OP)
a woman is someone who is a natural victim, a second class citizen, a hole and a baby factory
trans women are only lacking the baby factory part and reducing women to that one aspect is a larger part of why gender criticals are terrible voices for the definition of a woman, they hate women and want their defining nature reduced even further

>>41461151
"many women do not want to be women" is literally the first line of the second sentence
as the exception, you prove the rule
also odds are you're a repressed trans man anyway if you're a transphobe posting on this board

>>41461147
All those things can also happen to men (except the periods but they really don't sound so bad)

>>41461157
i dont think black people are human and when people point humane niggers to me it only strengthens my case that these people are secretly baboons

>>41461159
but the societal gender role of women is so low that it would only be adopted by those who actually desire it
men who fit all those categories do not fit the societal gender role for men, this is not to say that all men outside the binary role are women, or even not men, but that society will judge them effeminate for doing so

>>41461165
are you saying you dont think women are humans?

>>41461122 (OP)
because its up to personal definition. so for example i have a definition. the definition makes it so a handful of girls on here a actually women but then others are excluded from womanhood even though they claim they are woman. But thats okay because i dont ever view them as woman even if I still refer to them by a pronoun. And when i say view them as woman i mean in a sexual way and for the purposes of procreation. thats really the only reason it would matter to a cishet like myself anyways. because im supposed to want certain women for breeding purposes. also i should ingratiate myself with woman I have no sexual interest in but thats optional. I still interact with all of them and try to be friendly and try to get along with them like the basics i do for everyone else.

But thats my take. Obviously either this is cruel or their reasons are even crueler or they have no definition for a woman. And the reason is because as soon as they allow for a definitive definition to prevail then they just have set another standard to dominate and for that system of oppression to exploit.