>>41598736 (OP)
Due to the legal systems extreme unwillingness to recognize the sexual agency of minors, the usage of the phrase “child molestation” doesn’t tell me anything about whether it was the young persons choice or not.(in other words, whether they were true victims or not). I still don’t know what these two men actually did due to government backed orwellian doublespeak.
Sexual bonding is just like any other kind of bonding. Underage people have sexuality. “Incest” is just familial bonding under a different word. If the young person says yes to it, it’s morally neutral at worst.
I think adults who try their hardest to undermine the sexual autonomy of minors, who strive to teach them that sex is something evil, are the true “child molesters”. I think if there less religious adults expressing moral outrage over sexually active children having sexually active lives, there would be a whole lot less of these so called trauma stories from statutory “rape”.