.

I feel traumatised by this hideous artstyle

>>24465412 (OP)
the yellow bobbleheaded guys with the blue books look a lot like the uohhhhhh emojis in the catalog

>>24465412 (OP)
I dislike this art style

>>24465412 (OP)
Leftists talk about AI putting artists out of work and this is the artist they're on about.

>>24465459
>>24465451
>>24465463
I bet each you faggots suck off Adventure Time, Chowder, Flapjack, and Regular Show, and all the cartoons they inspired.

>>24465467
>Adventure Time, Chowder, Flapjack, and Regular Show
who?

>>24465467
Adventure Time season 1-6 is genuinely great but the rest of the shows you mentioned are pretty trash when your older than 12

>>24465474
I disagree on Flapjack. Out of all of those listed it's been the only to genuinely get some laughs out of me.

>>24465477
Maybe. I haven't seen it in like 10 years.

>>24465474
>>24465477
Checkmate faggots. The OP cartoon and those shows have the same art style.

>>24465412 (OP)
What? The raven represents grief. It's not subtle. The guy is sitting there mourning his dead girlfriend and then a carrion bird shows up and says "nevermore." And then he tries to kill it because he does not, in fact, fucking love ravens. Why are zoomers terrified to admit that symbols exist?

>>24465467
I've never watched any of that Burger slop. This seems like projection. Go back to posting your shitty "art" and cartoon posts on /co/.

>>24465412 (OP)
The teacher isn't wrong. It's not her fault the author might have been a retard who didn't bother to think about what exactly appeals to him in ravens, but thankfully we can analyze his writing to make suggestions about it.
>>24465485
It's not just zoomers, it has been that way for generaitons. Remember: most people in the world are not writers, nor creators. Even something as basic as symbols might be confusing to them, because they have not suppressed their gut instinct to take everything literally enough to be creative. If they ever take up books, they expect them to be entertaining, like a thrilling action movie. And dissecting prose for subtext is not their idea of entertainment.

Awesome. And so typical. Reminds me of the Kurt Vonnegut arc in the movie "Back To School".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDLzLUmtU3w

>>24465467
Those are children's cartoons anon.

>>24465412 (OP)
But the Raven is an antagonistic figure. The teacher is correct. What is even the point of this

>>24465719
The point is if you read beneath the surface level you're a hecking english teacher and that's hecking bad.

>>24465412 (OP)
>no thinking! Just take everything literally!
You should read Soviet literature then.

>>24465545
Which is especially strange considering primitive/ancient cultures had a better understanding of symbolism than the dreck alive today.

>>24465412 (OP)
Analysing some work of art is not entirely about grasping the author's point of view, it's also about what the reader perceives.

>>24465485
thats the joke you retard

>>24465412 (OP)

>>24465791
you're giving this "artist" way too much credit if you think he's joking

>>24465809

>>24465412 (OP)
Terrible art style.

>>24466011
Show us yours, then.

>>24465804

>>24466016
>>24466053

>>24466053
It's wonderful

>>24466053
>same graphic, seething captions
t. phony

>>24465467
Two of those are okay for a few episodes but the artstyle sucks regardless

>>24466138
Then point us to your successful animated series, so that we may all bask in your wonderment.

>>24465516
American culture is your culture. Stop failing to overcome hegemony.

>>24466136
Yeah, but there's a small joke in each panel now and the overall joke is still there and more coherent. That makes the artstyle forgivable.

I'd probably put the Poe ghost on the other side, maybe with quotation marks around it, and the 'cut your dicks off' right beside it so it's all implied as dialogue.

YWNBAW btw.

This is barely a topic, OP just posted a fucking full-stop along with his reductionist comic.

>trannies trannies trannies
Not as small a joke as your tiny penis.

>seething this much
Did you just dilate or something?

>still trannies trannies trannies
it's a very disgusting image to have rent free in your mishapen head

>mishappen(sic) head
Dysmorphia confirmed.

>>24466184
I already am a writer. I've written well over 100 short stories, as well as a few screenplays and novels. One of my short stories has been published, and another one won an award. What exactly is your definition of a "writer"?

>trannies trannies
nice projection, american

>>24466257
>"writer"

>>24466193
>trannies trannies trannies
>>24466230
>still trannies trannies trannies
>>24466260
>trannies trannies

>>24466276
usually people that think that much about them, have a fetish for them too

>>24465412 (OP)
what Poe actually meant:
>I am le hecking wholesome chungus
>ravens are so random and quirky just like me
>fuck the patriarchy

>>24466322
>>fuck the patriarchy
its consequences have been disastrous for half the human race

>>24466171
>American culture
lol

>>24466268
>jealous seething
Still waiting for your definition of "writer". Mine includes "someone that actually writes, instead of just fantasizing about it".

>>24466311
Yeah. The guy who keeps writing "trannies trannies trannies" is definitely projecting something. Probably a fetish.

>>24466334
>"writer"
Lol

>>24466340
I accept your concession.

>>24466345
>concession
Lol

>>24466053
this is tolerable

>>24465412 (OP)
This is explicitly a bad example of the teacher overcomplicating things, this time the teacher is right.

>>24466053
I'm impressed by the seethe this edit set off.

>>24466419
>hurr durr muh peepee
never change, 4chan

>>24465412 (OP)
Typically authors of literature do indeed intend for their work to have manifold interpretations.

>>24465451
Weak

>>24466426
>more seethe

>>24465412 (OP)
The image is not wrong.

>>24465412 (OP)

>And the Raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting
>On the pallid bust of Pallas just above my chamber door;
>And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon’s that is dreaming,
>And the lamp-light o’er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor;
>And my soul from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor
>Shall be lifted—nevermore!

"The guy who wrote about the guy so heartbroken he gets into an argument with a bird, looses, and sinks into despair just hekin' loved Ravens folx!"

>>24465463
If you haven't noticed the people complaining about AI art are all unemployed losers who have deviant art pages and suck at art to begin with. They aren't making money off their "art" in the first place. It's just another boogeyman to blame for their infinite failures in life.

>>24465467
Not everyone here’s a zoomer or Gen Alpha. Hell of a projection kek

>>24466935
Not that guy but I'd wager 90% of this board are college aged unemployed cringe lords with no friends. Just look at the catalog. It screams "I'm 15 and these concepts are very deep and important!!!"

>>24466911
Hello saar

>>24465451
This.
It's why everyone loves manga but not shitty comics.

>>24465463
If you can be put out of business by AI image generation, then you weren't much of an artist to begin with. Simple as. Plus I'll bet you whined when India started making their own animated movies.

>>24466053
Kek, accurate

>>24466911
Good morning sir!

>>24466972
Omg this is actually a fucking pajeet ewwwwww fuck off

>>24467006
No, these are pajeets. And I brought them up because the people whining about AI taking their jobs are such lousy "artists" that pajeets took their jobs first.

>>24465467
>Chowder, Flapjack, and Regular Show
Never watched Adventure Time but I watched the rest.
The big difference is that most of the appeal of their art style was their worlds. E.g. Flapjack looks like shitty docks.
If you remove the environment, you end up with shitty stick noodles that I don't like. I was never impressed with Regular Shows's characters on a technical level, but I like how stupid it gets in the second half of episodes.
>>24466145
Cromartie High School. Now that show has the on-point art.

>>24467099
all faggot anime looks the same

>>24466053
This is better.

>>24465467
holy based

This comic is bad and you should feel bad.
Poe was - clearly - making a comment on the finality of death and the inability to change one's past decisions. If Poe was going to write a poem about how much he fucking loved black carrion fowl he would have written that poem.

>>24466941
If you're interested /a/ actually had a quite productive thread exploring the difference between "western" and manga art.
>>>/a/279629919

The conclusion I found was that manga artists rigourously study proper drawing form and didn't get fucked by cal arts.

>>24467987
if he didn't love whales why did he spend an entire chapter on explaining whale taxonomy?

What the author wrote:
>on night's Plutonian shore
What the retarded, illiterate student thinks:
>uh... I guess Poe is writing about the beach on the planet Pluto now?
What the person with a two second Google search can figure out
>Pluto is the god of the underworld, and the narrator is mourning his dead wife, so I guess he's talking about the shore between the living and the dead?
What the-curtains-were-fucking-blue retards think it means:
>Pluto is Mickey's dog! Did Poe go to Disneyworld?

>>24465412 (OP)
the idea that the raven is actually just about how much he loves ravens is pretty funny

>>24465412 (OP)
Poe explained what he meant and why he used a raven in the Philosophy of Composition. Really the worst example to use for this shitty comic and its shitty message.

>>24465412 (OP)
>conscious
It's conscience not conscious, but I'm sure whoever made this was so much smarter than their literature teacher