← Home ← Back to /lit/

Thread 24465980

11 posts 8 images /lit/
Anonymous No.24465980 [Report] >>24466517 >>24466585 >>24466661 >>24466688 >>24466706 >>24466817 >>24466838
Is China actually committed to socialism, marxism and communism? Or is China just China without a need for an ideology? Or are they even fascistic?
Anonymous No.24466057 [Report]
China strategy
Anonymous No.24466517 [Report]
>>24465980 (OP)
Yes they are committed. Only retard right wingers say otherwise.
Anonymous No.24466585 [Report] >>24466598
>>24465980 (OP)
/lit/?
maybe you shall ask in /pol/ but i bet you will receive bogus opinions anyways.
I believe the PR China current state isn't communist at all , but rather a socialist sovereign state that maintains its secular integrity through authoritarian means. While it has granted more freedoms to its people compared to Mao Zedong era, the nation effectively embraced capitalism long ago when it established diplomatic relations with Western countries under Deng Xiaoping presidency a trajectory that continued till chairman XI Jinping.
i believe their government maintain communist symbolism primarily to foster national unity and counteract anti-state propaganda originating coming from the Western nations.
Anonymous No.24466598 [Report]
>>24466585
1st panel on the badge
Anonymous No.24466661 [Report]
>>24465980 (OP)
I love literature it's the best
Anonymous No.24466688 [Report]
>>24465980 (OP)
They are committed to "socialism with chinese characteristics" which means following the plan laid out by Marx wherein a state must achieve capitalism to complete the dialectic and proceed towards communism.
They call this "building the productive forces".

In reality building the productive forces will never end. Its just justification for the continued existence of one-party rule.
Anonymous No.24466706 [Report]
>>24465980 (OP)
They are the Chinese COMMUNIST party not the Chinese Nationalist Party, so yes they have to at least commit themselves to that ideology or else they are no different than the KMT and the KMT might as well come back.
Anonymous No.24466817 [Report]
>>24465980 (OP)
Yes they are. But they need to focus on what makes them the most powerful to avoid capitalist influence and subjugation like what happened with many socialist countries before them.

If they fall, there will likely be no chance for a communist country for an extremely long time. Any other socialist countries will inevitably fall (aside from North Korea who will just stay isolated and completely cut off from the rest of the world) without them. Russia is too involved with nonsensical imperialist nationalist rubbish to ever go back to socialism in the near future.
Anonymous No.24466838 [Report]
>>24465980 (OP)
They're not really communists anymore, they make all their money through the free market. Even North Korea are opening up trade with the world in certain economic zones. It really does prove even "successful" communist states cannot operate thrive on communism forever and has to open up to global, free market trade.
Anonymous No.24466847 [Report]
As a Chinese American zoomer, China in practice is pretty much just capitalist with red window dressing

Like think about how similar the school and work competition are in China and South Korea, despite one being nominally capitalist and the other socialist

Maybe things weren't this way when "new China" was first getting off the ground, but currentyear China? Definitely