>>24477691Yes, but it isn't interesting.
When you hear Valle make his case in the book, at least as a modern 35> year old person, you instantly recognize what he's doing, he's doing what picrel and the history channel are famous for doing:
"is it possible that (absurdly retarded sensational explanation)...I'm not saying it is - I'm just asking questions"
And that's all it ever is/was with Valle.
Every case he discusses can be explained with
>Yes but Jacques, what if they were just making it the fuck up for attention? You know, like happens literally all the time with any news story about a missing person or a murder or anything else sensational and in the public eye?And that is something he refuses to engage with, even in a basic way which doesn't doubt the wild nature of these stories, but something agonistic like ensuring stories (regardless of content) remain consistent over time.
Instead he stiches together a bunch idea he misunderstands from cogneuro, physics, etc as the catch all pseudoscientific solution, which is infinitely less believable than a sensational but realistic "maybe there are high tech ayys visiting earth".
>SOVery long effort post short, the foundations of the CCRU (and it IS hyperstition) are very retarded, but they've tricked people thanks to Land tossing this dumbass dipshit asshole retard idea with Jamaican Jerk levels of Marxist mumbo jumbo seasn'n.