Bros... if someone read Kant and is watching vtubers... I don't think it can be true or anything of value...

>>24478211 (OP)
Holy shit, you've been buck broken, you're actually spamming now. That's crazy man.

>>24478222
Hi lolcow, post more vtuberinos

>>24478226
Not my fault you can't understand basic Kant

>>24478211 (OP)
Not only did this poster not say anything about anything Kant said that wasn’t in the literal introduction, i.e. the first few pages, of the critique of pure reason, he also didn’t even seem to notice the real major flaws in the post of the guy he was replying too. It becomes incredibly easy to see how many people have not read Kant once you read Kant.

>>24478229
>More delusions of grandeur that show your deteriorating mental state
>Gets exposed as a posing midwit by >>24478230
Give up and stop replying, agptuber. It's over. You lost.

>>24478233
>Gets exposed as a posing midwit by >>24478230
It'd be cool to get some engagement on the thread about the topic, instead of just "oh you're wrong" talk.

Not only did you fail to respond to anon's comments but you shit your pants over the presence of anime images instead of even attempting to address the argument at hand.
Why are you here? Why did you respond in the first place? Do you care about the problems that Kant raised and his attempted solutions, about the potential to ground knowledge and epistemology in something, or are you just another bored autist looking for cheap (You)s? Is the fleeting dopamine rush of slightly annoying a stranger on the internet worth the time you spend on it - time you will never get back, time which brings you ever closer to your inevitable death?
By engaging with the actual argument you could have come closer to understanding Kant's point about synthetic a priori knowledge through dialectic - even if anon's comment contained errors - but instead you chose this pathetic farce. Why?

>>24478236
I’m done talking about Kant, you can guys can keep debating him amongst yourselves

>>It'd be cool to get some engagement on the thread about the topic, instead of just "oh you're wrong" talk.
It's more like "holy shit you are such a loser that nobody on either side cares about what you say and we want to publicly point and laugh at you"

>>24478240
Hi agptroon, stop samefagging and post more vtuberinos, I'm not reading any of that

vtubers are a redflag that you 'might' be mentally ill (you are)

>>24478277
even very mentally ill people I know think vtubers are weird

>Ruffians are the intellectuals
Who would've thought.

>>24478356
It's a valid point >>24477943

I genuinely can't understand what goes through the mind of someone who avatarfags. Like, I cannot imagine writing something then going through to the file picker to pick some random picture of a character that adds nothing to my post. Why do they do it?

>>24478211 (OP)
Honestly the intellect of the average Kantian is probably on par with the average vtuber enjoyer so this adds up.

>>24478356
>>24478386
Hi agptroon, stop samefagging and post more vtuberinos
>intellectuals
McIntellectuals

>>24478211 (OP)
Fuck off vtumor.
I thought bronies were the worst subhumans to happen on this planet, but you guys are somehow worse than them.
How do you simp for a whore who takes advantage of lonely guys and pretend they're something their not?
No one wants to deal with your kind.

>>24478406
>>24478393
Gynocentric society must end

>>24478211 (OP)
Make another thread based off of a post you don't like in this thread. The catalog is your bitch.

>>24478388
they want to be remembered

... because watching VTubers violates the categorical imperative?